from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0AE16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:05:25 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 12 Sep 2002 00:05:25 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g8BMRkC02757 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:27:46 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pFwv-0003cR-00; Wed,
    11 Sep 2002 15:27:05 -0700
from vtn1.victoria.tc.ca ([199.60.222.3]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17pFwM-0001wa-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:26:30 -0700
from vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (iwhite@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    vtn1.victoria.tc.ca (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8BMQNPL008396;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
(from iwhite@localhost) by vtn1.victoria.tc.ca
    (8.12.5/8.12.3/Submit) id g8BMQMNP008390; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:26:22 -0700
    (PDT)
Re: [SAtalk] Badly Formatted Spam Report in HTML spam
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Sep 12 00:05:26 2002

On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Vince Puzzella wrote:
> Ever since I set defang_mime 0 all spam that contains HTML has a badly
> formatted report.  I think/realize it's because the report should be in
> HTML.  Is there anyway to get Spamassassin to add an HTML report in
> cases where it is required (defang_mime 0)?
Funny, I was in the middle of composing the same message when I saw yours.
It would be nice if it sees a header like:
and defang_mime is 0, it could wrap the report with <pre></pre> for ease
And the same sort of problem seems to occur with base64 encoded messages.
The report is placed inside of the mime boundary:
Should this not go above (probably in it's own mime section,) to make sure
that the attachments don't get destroyed?