from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE8A16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:51:47 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 16:51:47 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g8DE7PC21522 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:07:25 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pr4E-0005ym-00; Fri,
    13 Sep 2002 07:05:06 -0700
from betty.magenta-netlogic.com ([193.37.229.181]
    helo=mail.magenta-netlogic.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pr3S-0001PJ-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:04:18 -0700
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    mail.magenta-netlogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B886BFA9E;
    Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:04:13 +0100 (BST)
from greece.local.net (greece.local.net [::ffff:192.168.1.31])
    by mail.magenta-netlogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A719BFA9A;
    Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:04:12 +0100 (BST)
by greece.local.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
    <RXNP4B5Z>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:04:11 +0100
RE: [SAtalk] Getting yourself removed from spam lists
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Sep 13 16:51:47 2002

> Subject: [SAtalk] Getting yourself removed from spam lists
> I get the feeling that the spammers never
> On the other hand, that doesn't make sense:
> wouldn't they get worried about their millions
> of spams being wasted?  Don't they WANT *some*
> prove that they indeed *reach* people somehow?
No, they only have to prove that they send several million
emails to 'potential clients' to get their money.  I don't think
they even care much about bounces.  They're con-artists, why
should they care about proving they actually reached people?
Most of the time the bounce goes to some poor soul who has