No, hits=-4.6 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-7.6 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs

On 11 Sep 2002, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> So then why does my webhost _still_ only give me 200MB?
Because ~10 krpm server SCSII doesn't follow the curve. Most rackspace is
ridiculously expensive/unit, so people don't use low end EIDE hardware
there.

No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>, forkit! <fork@example.com>
No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST
	version=2.50-cvs

from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BKhcC31373 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 21:43:38 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0312B408EB; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    16:42:45 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11BB3F5C6
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:41:37 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8BKfWH05116 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    16:41:32 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BKfWk05112 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:41:32 -0400

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C009C16F1E
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:39:23 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 05 Sep 2002 12:39:23 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g85Ba9Z16982 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:36:09 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17muuh-0002Nz-00; Thu,
    05 Sep 2002 04:35:07 -0700
from lerlaptop.lerctr.org ([207.158.72.14]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17muuZ-0007mO-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 05 Sep 2002 04:34:59 -0700
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.lerctr.org
    (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g85BYtaY083601 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:34:55 -0500
    (CDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org)
[SAtalk] www.spamassassin.org: giving a HTTP/1.1 error from
    sourceforge?
No, hits=-3.5 required=7.0
	tests=FOR_FREE,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Sep  5 12:39:38 2002