On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, John P. Looney wrote:
>  I've found a decrepit raq3 that I'm going to resurrect, as soon as I work
> out what's up with the console.
>
>  I'm using 115200 8n1 with minicom, and I'm getting wierd stuff like:
Should it be 38K4 - a fairly common baudrate for serial port
connections? Though if you are getting this much, the baudrate
may be right. It looks like high ASCII so it may also be worth
playing with the tty type (ANSI/VT etc).
>  So it looks like some sort of setting mismatch. Various places on the web
> say that cobalts are setup with 115200 8n1 serial ports, but someone could
> have changed it on this particular box.
Regards...jmcc
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
> With the increasing prevalence of web services (not that they are always a
> good thing), I doubt that parsing XML will be something that will remain at
> the Java application layer for long... Recent threads here on Fork
> indicating the move towards hardware parsing or this code even become part
> of the native implementation of Java on various platforms...
OK, so, you get the XML toss it through hardware and turn it back into a
struct/object whatever you call your binary data. I agree this is the way
things will go, as XML parsing has just too much overhead to survive in the
application layer. So why turn it into XML in the first place? Becasue it
gives geeks something to do and sells XML hardware accelerators and way more
CPUs?
Is there anyone out there actually doing anything new that actually IMPROVES
things anymore, or are they all too scared of the fact that improvements put
people out of work and cut #1 is the creators...
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
beberg@mithral.com

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98Fp9K22849 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:51:10 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6ED412F4; Tue,  8 Oct 2002
    11:50:29 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FCA41723
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 11:21:21 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g98FLKI25296 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 8 Oct 2002
    11:21:20 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g98FLKf25292 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 11:21:20 -0400
No, hits=-22.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs