| Tell me what keystroke made it happen so I can reproduce it and I'll
| see what I can do about it (or if I can't, I'll hand it off to Brent).
Don't worry too much about it, you seem to have plenty of other things
to do in the immediate future, and this one isn't so critical that people
But, to make it happen, type (with normal key bindings) any digit, so the
code thinks you're trying a message number, then backspace, so the digit
goes away, then '-' (other junk characters don't seem to have the
problem, I have just been playing).   That will do it (every time).
Once you get into that state, the same traceback occurs for every
character you type, until a message is selected with the mouse.
This is looking like it might be easy to find and fix, so I'll take a

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7S4DtZ10295 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:13:55 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607353ECF2; Wed, 28 Aug 2002
    00:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BE240765
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:12:16 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7S4CDf21950 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 28 Aug 2002
    00:12:13 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7S4CDY21946 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 00:12:13 -0400
No, hits=-7.6 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NO_REAL_NAME,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
	version=2.40-cvs

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7S7fqZ15069 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:41:52 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B745A3EE66; Wed, 28 Aug 2002
    03:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085C43F409
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:41:16 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7S7fCQ19268 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 28 Aug 2002
    03:41:12 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7S7fCY19264 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:41:12 -0400
from ratree.psu.ac.th ([202.28.97.6]) by mx1.example.com
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7S7Q6l04801 for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>;
    Wed, 28 Aug 2002 03:26:07 -0400
No, hits=-12.1 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
	version=2.40-cvs