On 11 Sep 2002, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> So then why does my webhost _still_ only give me 200MB?
Because ~10 krpm server SCSII doesn't follow the curve. Most rackspace is
ridiculously expensive/unit, so people don't use low end EIDE hardware
there.

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D89F16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:16:24 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:16:24 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 2D3B82940BD; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net
    [64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 875BF29409A for
    <fork@xent.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
    11 Sep 2002 19:08:10 -0000
From salon.com - Forbidden thoughts about 9/11
From fork-admin@xent.com  Wed Sep 11 20:16:24 2002

i though this was all rather interesting, first bit of 9/11 coverage that

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686C716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:39:40 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:39:40 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 782582940AE; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:17:04 -0700 (PDT)
from crank.slack.net (slack.net [166.84.151.181]) by xent.com
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5A429409A for <fork@xent.com>; Wed,
    11 Sep 2002 17:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
by crank.slack.net (Postfix, from userid 596) id 935633ED61;
    Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crank.slack.net
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B813ECF4 for <fork@xent.com>; Wed,
    11 Sep 2002 20:22:18 -0400 (EDT)
From fork-admin@xent.com  Thu Sep 12 13:39:41 2002