from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89FB43C44
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 06:52:12 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:52:12 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 2325A294139; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
from mithral.com (watcher.mithral.com [204.153.244.1]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2217729409D for <fork@xent.com>;
    Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Re: POLICY CHANGE: subscriber-only posting
From fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Aug 20 11:53:41 2002

On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Rohit Khare wrote:
> Sorry, gang, but I've flipped the switch. If your posting address
> doesn't match your subscription address, or if you've instructed a robot
> to forkpost on your behalf, it'll get held, silently, for me or Kragen
> to review. Which will be rarely, so be warned.
>
> Let's see how this works out for a week or so...
And I didnt even need to visit, woohoo :)
... Proving that the threat of my presence gets action in only 14 hours. I
think I should be offended, but I'll be too busy basking in the glow of a
spam-free FoRK :)
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
beberg@mithral.com
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

Your message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 16:11:36 EDT."
             <LNBBLJKPBEHFEDALKOLCOENCBCAB.tim.one@comcast.net>

> [Guido]
> > Perhaps more useful would be if Tim could check in the pickle(s?)
> > generated by one of his training runs, so that others can see how
> > Tim's training data performs against their own corpora.
[Tim]
> I did that yesterday, but seems like nobody bit.
I downloaded and played with it a bit, but had no time to do anything
systematic.  It correctly recognized a spam that slipped through SA.
But it also identified as spam everything in my inbox that had any
MIME structure or HTML parts, and several messages in my saved 'zope
geeks' list that happened to be using MIME and/or HTML.
So I guess I'll have to retrain it (yes, you told me so :-).
> Just in case <wink>, I
> uploaded a new version just now.  Since MINCOUNT went away, UNKNOWN_SPAMPROB
> is much less likely, and there's almost nothing that can be pruned away (so
> the file is about 5x larger now).
>
>     http://sf.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61702
I'll try this when I have time.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)