from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117D947C76
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 07:42:12 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:42:12 +0100 (IST)
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g829uBZ27652 for
    <zzzz-ilug@spamassassin.taint.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:56:11 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28572; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:55:45 +0100
from intmailsrv02.fleishman.mail (mail.fleishman.com
    [207.193.111.249]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28537
    for <ilug@linux.ie>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 10:55:29 +0100
lugh.tuatha.org: Host mail.fleishman.com
    [207.193.111.249] claimed to be intmailsrv02.fleishman.mail
from ims01east.fleishman.com ([207.193.111.247]) by
    intmailsrv02.fleishman.mail with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
    Mon, 2 Sep 2002 04:55:27 -0500
by ims01east with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89) id
    <RVXP8WHQ>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 04:54:47 -0500
[ILUG] Can I be added to your email distribution lists?
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Sep  2 13:14:35 2002

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36DC16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:31:47 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 24 Sep 2002 23:31:47 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 19D072940D3; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by xent.com
    (Postfix) with SMTP id CB2E42940C8 for <fork@xent.com>; Tue,
    24 Sep 2002 12:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
From fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Sep 24 23:31:48 2002

Read the article.  I'm afraid I don't understand how the transmission
But I'm also really leery of telling a pipeline company they have to run
a pipeline at a higher pressure and that they should forego maintenance.
We had a big pipeline explosion up here awhile ago.
So maybe the judge has a point.  We'll see as the appeals work its way
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 5:16 AM
> from slate's "today's papers":  The New York Times and Los Angeles
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 11:57 PM
> Depends on how much over spending vs. how much (and what type) over
> The biggest problem with over regulation is the costs can be
> It also has the ability to single out particular people, while over
> spending spreads the damage more evenly.  Rent control would be an
> example of a regulation solution that is in general worse than
> As for the definition of a liberal being someone who seeks to impose
> both, I find no fault in that definition whatsoever.  The opinion that
> EITHER we are spending too much OR we have too much regulation is
> Finally, those who argue that there are private replacements for much
> government regulation are not saying that a state of nature (no
> replacements, no government regulation) is better than government
> And in my experience people who label themselves 'Green' (which does
> include everyone who loves trees and thinks smokestacks are ugly) is a
> > funny. i read it as green = red, as in accounting, as in fiscally
> > irresponsible.  which do you think is the worse indictment -
> > or overspending?  there are many (dickheads) who buy into the
> > neo-conservative media's (fox's) definiton of "liberal" as "one who