from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA4143C34
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 13:54:09 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:54:09 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7FHsti11418 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 18:54:55 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17fOaT-0008QF-00; Thu,
    15 Aug 2002 10:39:09 -0700
from mx-out.daemonmail.net ([216.104.160.37]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17fOa8-0007v9-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu,
    15 Aug 2002 10:38:48 -0700
from mx0.emailqueue.net (localhost.daemonmail.net [127.0.0.1])
    by mx-out.daemonmail.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA73195 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
    (envelope-from brian@unearthed.com)
from brianmay (brianmay [64.52.135.194]) by mail.unearthed.com
    with ESMTP id 0rI0WvO2 Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 15 18:54:09 2002

Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Razor-users] Re: What's wrong with the Razor servers now?
> > > It's not my desire to second-guess you Vipul (however much my missives
> > > may appear otherwise) or question the hard work you and the other
> > > developers have put into the system, however it seems that every
> > > for such information has been met with silence.
> > There are no plans for releasing details about TeS. Before the
> > release of Razor2, I'd pointed out that Razor2 backend (specially
> Thanks for the clarification. Guess it's time to find something that is
Why do the details of the backend need to be open?
I don't think that Ebay publishes it's proprietary trust backend, why