> the number 1 ISP in France and the third ISP in
> Europe Wanadoo.fr is using non RFC2822 compliant
Wanadoo.fr is notorious for being unresponsive to spam abuse
complaints.  Some of the more militant admins have blocked them

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6EA44162
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:04:47 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:04:47 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7SKURZ09244 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:30:27 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17k9R2-000138-00; Wed,
    28 Aug 2002 13:29:04 -0700
from yrex.com ([216.40.247.31] helo=host.yrex.com) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17k9QQ-0002eH-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:28:26 -0700
from mgm.dsl.xmission.com (HELO opus) (204.228.152.186) by
    yrex.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 20:28:21 -0000
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 29 11:05:54 2002

> I may be dense, but why would anyone want to utilize Habeus?  To
> me, it looks like a potential backdoor to anyone's defenses against spam.
You're not dense. I'm going to zero the habeas scores on my copy of
SpamAssassin. I think they were added to SA quite prematurely. To me it's
simple:
1. People who send me legitimate email have absolutely no motivation to use
Habeas, at least until it gets lots more press, and even then only
bulk-mailing companies like Amazon or eBay are going to bother, and I
already whitelist them. Individuals won't bother.
2. Spammers have lots of motivation to forge the Habeas headers, and a good
percentage of them are completely out of the legal reach of Habeas.
I think it should be subjected to the same testing and scrutiny as any other
potential new rule. When I test against my corpus here's what I get:
OVERALL     SPAM  NONSPAM     S/O   SCORE  NAME
13851     8919     4932    0.64    0.00  (all messages)
0        0        0    0.00   -1.00  HABEAS_SWE
The score of -1.0 is pretty harmless right now, but it still looks like a
useless rule so far.
--
Michael Moncur  mgm at starlingtech.com  http://www.starlingtech.com/
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." --Napoleon
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk