For what you're trying to do, forwarding does not work.
'bounce' works perfectly, if you can do that.
Another option is to save spam to a folder and report
On 26/07/02 08:41 +0200, Jørgen Thomsen wrote:
) I just want to be sure, that forwarding an email to my own spamtrap address
) which performs a razor-report on the entire received email is not waste of
) time, because the contents of the forwarded email is not recognized as equal
) to the email originally received. The forwarded email has a new set of
) headerlines, which should be discarded and instead the headerlines of the
) original message are in the body of this new message and should be recognized
) An ordinary Forward Unquoted in Agent is subject to character set conversions
) and does not depict the received spam in its original form.

No, hits=-888.3 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=0.1 required=5.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,T_URI_COUNT_0_1,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.50-cvs

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65405440DB
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:50:34 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79LhVb26539 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 22:43:31 +0100
from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com
    [216.136.174.113]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with SMTP id
    g79LapJ08711 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 23:36:51 +0200
from usercb247.dsl.pipex.com (HELO yahoo.co.uk)
    (salimma1@62.190.233.247 with plain) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with
    SMTP; 9 Aug 2002 21:36:50 -0000
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Mon Aug 12 10:51:41 2002

>>One of the things you need to understand with gnome2 is that while they
>>did simplify a lot of things, most of the configuration options people
>>found very useful are still available through gconf. Learn to love
>>gconf-editor ;) -- metacity can have sloppy focus (Desktop Preferences
>>-> Window Focus -- there's actually GUI for that), and the delay until
>>raising (and whether it raises) can be set in gconf-editor,
>The thing is, I hadn't used gconf-editor yet... and it's exactly what I
>feared, old "not so good" memories are coming back : It looks exactly like
>I still hope that the few missing features I'm still looking for will be
>added in the next 2.0.x releases, like for example being able to have the
>panel always under *all* other windows (if you know how to do that, I'm
More like Apple's implementation - the Gconf2 files are bog-standard
XML, should you feel tempted to edit it by hand :)
There are some possibilities that using standardised configuration tools
provide: the ability to centrally manage a large number of computers -
something like Windows' group policy. Although that would require other
Haven't installed Limbo beta2 myself - been sidetracked by work; the
fact that the computer I'm installing it on is connected to a dodgy USB
ADSL modem that requires heavy kernel patching means that I would have
to do it over a weekend - but I don't think Red Hat currently does it