Harlan Feinstein said:
> In particular, I was going to have a menu entry available for:
> o  remove the SA markup from a message
> o  add/remove addresses to whitelist
> Help!  :-)  I've never done customization of this type to my exmh install.
> I'm running version 2.4 (6/23/2000) on RedHat 7.3
Despite being the author of SpamAssassin, I've never fixed exmh to do
this.  I am therefore clearly not an exmh hacker ;)
But to simplify -- the first action is piping the message to an external
command, then replacing the message file with the output; and the second
is simply piping the message to another command, then ignoring the output.
I'd say it's easy enough to do, if someone can provide the tcl.
--j.
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA9C440A8
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  6 Aug 2002 18:17:02 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Aug 2002 23:17:02 +0100 (IST)
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g76MHSk21029 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:17:28 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ECD3F5B5; Tue,  6 Aug 2002
    18:16:02 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2E84038C
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Tue,  6 Aug 2002 18:14:40 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g76MEdc30538 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 6 Aug 2002
    18:14:39 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g76MEdq30534 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:14:39 -0400
from austin-jump.vircio.com (jump-austin.vircio.com
    [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g76M1fl29081
    for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 18:01:41 -0400
from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with
    qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4216. . Clean. Processed in 0.456682
    secs); 06/08/2002 17:14:37
from deepeddy.vircio.com (@[10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with
    SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 6 Aug 2002 22:14:37 -0000
(qmail 3781 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2002 22:14:34 -0000
from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com)
    (?KvRUZmfarpCGCPAn2RDtc8AtL/NljmRe?@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 6 Aug 2002 22:14:34 -0000
Re: scan bug: no update after Pick's "New FTOC"
From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Tue Aug  6 23:17:03 2002