Hi, folks -
Wearing my other hat today - we're looking for a competent and
experienced system administrator here, and I'd like anyone who's
interested to contact me.
The job is for a Windows (NT and 2000) and Linux (Debinan) system and
network administrator, with a good, deep knowledge of both
environments.  The successful candidate will have a broad range of
responsibilities in maintaining and developing our IT and production
infrastructure, including WAN/secure networking to remote offices,
email systems management, backups, etc., so experience in managing
larger networks is required.
Some development and implementation research experience would also be
highly desireable.
In addition, the position will involve internal IT support for a
primarily Windows network with approximately fifty users in several
locations.
The precise remuneration package will depend on the skillset of the
successful applicant, but will include as standard a performance-based
bonus scheme, health insurance, stock options and participation in a
company-backed pension plan.
Please contact me directly if you wish to apply.
We now return you to your regularly-scheduled hrishy.
Colm
--
Colm Buckley - Systems Architect at NewWorldIQ
w : http://www.newworldiq.com/    e : colm@newworldiq.com
t : +353 1 4334334    f : +353 1 4334301    m : +353 87 2469146
Quantum mechanics: the dreams stuff is made of.
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie

No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MSN_FOOTER1,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.40-cvs

Lucas Gonze:
>Senders should vary the recipient list to include non-targets, like party
>officials, and to exclude targets enough to give them plausible
>deniability.
Which means the sender has a list of who the true
targets are, and who the fake targets are, and
scripts for mixing these. On the receiving side,
my email client distinguishes between messages
that are read, and messages that are not. I like
to mark or save messages that are particularly
interresting or important to me. And even if I
make a point to delete "suspicious material"
immediately upon reading it, even THAT might
leave an interesting kind of trace on my machine.
Sorry, but I don't buy the argument that spam
protects people who want to distribute or see
material the government disapproves.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork