from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26C4440D9
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 10:20:50 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:20:51 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79EHib05892 for
    <jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:17:44 +0100
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04794 for <jm-ilug@jmason.org>;
    Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:20:56 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA31927; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:17:19 +0100
from lhidns.gov.ie ([193.1.228.222]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA31901 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Fri,
    9 Aug 2002 10:17:14 +0100
from gw.educ.irlgov.ie (educ-gw.gov.ie [192.168.6.1] (may be
    forged)) by lhidns.gov.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08675;
    Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:16:37 +0100
(from fwtk@localhost) by gw.educ.irlgov.ie (8.8.6/8.8.6) id
    LAA29334; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:35:34 +0100 (BST)
from unknown(10.0.0.13) by gw.educ.irlgov.ie via smap (V2.0) id
    xmaa29321; Fri, 9 Aug 02 11:35:15 +0100
[ILUG] TMDA (WAS --> slashdot EW Dijkstra humor]
from quoted-printable to 8bit by lugh.tuatha.org id
    KAA31901
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Fri Aug  9 15:21:02 2002

>You could also change your e-mail to a more responsible provider. If
>Eircom
>are not up to scratch, then use somebody else and make sure you let
>Eircom
>know why you think they are so useless. You can still keep your old
>e-mail
>address if you have to.
Since have done thanks, unfortunately Eircom
have a severe case of 'selective hearing'. It
seems that customer comments are only appreciated
when they are positive. When I was complaining
they also decided that I wasn't a paying
subscription customer but an Indigo GoFree one
and that if I didn't use Windows that there was
obviously something wrong with me (I mean who's
ever heard of Linux?).
>To suggest that ISP's should not protect themselves against
>incompotent
>configurations would effectively be a vote in support of SPAM.
True, I apologise for that. It was just the way
in which Eircom (didn't) deal with the ORBS problem.
Regards,
Shane
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie