On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:01:02 BST, Adrian Murphy said:
It sounds more like you're looking for a commercial service, in which
case "ain't got a bog", but on the offchance that you're looking for

No, hits=-7.3 required=7.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.40-cvs

DanQ> I think it would make more sense to start Habeas with a less
DanQ> aggressive score (one which will not give spammers a quick path
DanQ> into everyone's inbox) and after we've seen evidence that the
DanQ> system works, then we can increase the magnitude of the score.
Better yet, let the GA figure out the correct score. ;-) That will obviously
take awhile since you'll have to acquire enough messages with it, but it
should give you a good idea if the presence of Habeus headers are good spam
indicators or not.  If they are, my guess is that Habeus will probably not
succeed.
Taking things further off-topic: Does Habeus charge a license fee to
organizations who want to use their copyrighted material or is their sole
revenue stream to come from legal judgements?  On the one hand, if they
charge license fees, I'd worry that when times got tough they'd be somewhat
less critical of organizations we'd call spammers today in order to generate
license fees.  If not, I'd worry the pendulum would swing the other way and
they'd go after legitimate businesses in an attempt to generate more
revenues from judgements and/or out of court settlements.  Either way, it
seems like they have an interesting tightrope to walk.
--
Skip Montanaro
skip@pobox.com
consulting: http://manatee.mojam.com/~skip/resume.html
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F6F4415B
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:44:48 +0100 (IST)
from proton.pathname.com
    (adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.211.240]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7RLjPZ27063 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:45:25 +0100
from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
    (Debian)) id 17jo9X-00072t-00; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:45:35 -0700
yyyy@example.com's message of "Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:17:15 +0100"
No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.40-cvs
From quinlan@pathname.com  Wed Aug 28 10:45:34 2002