On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
> So Eugen, how many of your homo friends have -had- 3k lovers?
Just one. Not everybody does that. Most of them are now dead, anyway.
> Do you know anyone, outside of meybee Wilt Chamberlin and a few of the
> gang-bang porn queens who -have- had even 1.5k lovers?
Yes. Notice that I've specifically excluded sex industry. That be
cheating.
> Eegads, if you're hypothesizing numbers like -that- Eugen, you at
> least owe it to FoRK to back that shit up.
Ain't done no hypothesizing. Anecdotal evidence'R'Us. Couldn't you just
Google, or something?
> Otherwise we're liable to assume rampant unfounded homophobia and that
> would just be a lose.
Yeah, I'm a gay Jew Nazi Muslim who's also a lead character on Kaz's
underworld. Can we go on with the programme now?
> Just a quick assumption here.   I'm not a math geek or anything, but
> assuming 1 lover every day, that would be like at least one lover
> everyday for 8 years and some change.   I don't know about you, but
> very very few of us are -that- lucky (or even close to that lucky)
Which was my point. Gurls don't do hyperpromiscuity as a life style. It's
interesting that you're launching into a diatribe, and threaten using
instant argument (just add hominem) instead of assuming I might be not
just pulling this whole thing out my nether orifice.
> and after awhile, even the sexaholics get bored and have to mingle
> something new into their weekends.   You really are assumiing that the
> homosexual population is a) that large in a given area (The meccas
You ever been to San Francisco?
> might qualify, but try finding that kind of homosexual population in
> say, Tulsa, Oklahoma or Manchester, NH (Tho Manchester does have quite
Yeah, I think it could be also difficult finding a gay bathhouse in Thule,
Greenland. Or parts of central Africa. To think of it, both Oort and
Kuiper belts are utterly devoid of gay people as well. Isn't this
remarkable?
> a few nifty gaybars, but thats a different story)  b) that bored/sex
> obsessed/recreationally free to pursue sex that often, with that many
> partners or that they'd even WANT that many partners.
This doesn't happen because it couldn't happen. No one would want to.
Because you feel that way. Correct?
> Qualify yourself, or at least lower your outrageous numbers.
I didn't expect so much reflexive knee-jerking on this list.