> Has anyone made a working source RPM for dvd::rip for Red Hat 8.0?
I don't think I've tried yet, but if I did, I probably moved on to another
package after having bumped into one of the problems you mention.
If anyone sends me a patch to my spec file and eventually needed patches
etc., I'd be more than glad to make a new build available.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C5843F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 07:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:20:27 +0100 (IST)
(from mail@localhost) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
    g7NB9oq21542; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:09:50 +0100
From nobody@dogma.slashnull.org  Fri Aug 23 12:20:28 2002

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B4044166
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:05:15 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 23 Aug 2002 11:05:15 +0100 (IST)
from mclean.mail.mindspring.net (mclean.mail.mindspring.net
    [207.69.200.57]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7N5rgZ12375 for <jm@jmason.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:53:42 +0100
from user-105nd99.dialup.mindspring.com ([64.91.181.41]
    helo=belphegore.hughes-family.org) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17i7OE-00023R-00; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 01:53:46 -0400
from balam.hughes-family.org (balam.hughes-family.org
    [10.0.240.3]) by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
    63E8D71672; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason),
	"Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>,
	SpamAssassin Talk ML <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
From craig@deersoft.com  Fri Aug 23 11:07:09 2002

I never claimed it could learn *all* combinatorial
possibilities, but it certainly can learn some.
On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 07:21  PM, Scott A Crosby wrote:
>> It *can* learn combinatorial stuff in a more subtle way.  Imagine
> It can learn a few examples that happen to be linearily seperable,
> like those you gave. It cannot learn the example I gave below, which