> > Why?  What threat does Outlook pose to your organization?
> It has been described as "the technological equivalent of
> soliciting blood transfusions from random strangers in the
> street".  In short - it's a virus magnet.

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2154316F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:43:12 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:43:12 +0100 (IST)
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8ALpkC18012 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:51:46 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029BA403DD; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    17:42:14 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613AE3FEC0
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:32:00 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8ALVts11608 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    17:31:55 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8ALVtk11604 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:31:55 -0400
from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8ALFWw31621 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:15:32 -0400
from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com
    [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
    RAA22275 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:31:48 -0400
From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Wed Sep 11 13:43:12 2002

There is an "Update all scan caches" menu entry that rescans your
folders similar to the short scripts folks have shared around.  It
> > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Rick Baartman wrote:
> > Thanks Tom and Jacob. The above works, but without the double quotes:
> > sh -c 'for f in `folders -recurse -fast` ; do sortm +"$f" ; done'
> But there is a problem with making changes outside of exmh: the
> don't get updated. This is dangerous; I have to remember to re-scan each
> I enter. Is there a safeguard for this?