as I see it, there is a valid need for a "razor-cache" server that is
recursiveness would also be a nice feature, giving us the option to link
caches to offload the burden on the razor servers...
it could also allow us to setup local razor caches for private networks that
can bypass the razor servers all together...

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D025444107
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 11:32:38 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 02 Aug 2002 16:32:38 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g72FK8E01112 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:20:08 +0100
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04241 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 16:03:59 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17adne-0003u0-00; Fri,
    02 Aug 2002 07:53:06 -0700
from 12.ws.pa.net ([206.228.70.126] helo=sparrow.stearns.org) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17adnI-0004De-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri,
    02 Aug 2002 07:52:46 -0700
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sparrow.stearns.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g72Epxb22418; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:52:01 -0400
ML-razor-users <razor-users@example.sourceforge.net>,
	William Stearns <wstearns@pobox.com>,
	Jordan Ritter <jpr5@darkridge.com>
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  2 16:33:33 2002

> as I see it, there is a valid need for a "razor-cache" server that is
> recursiveness would also be a nice feature, giving us the option to link
> caches to offload the burden on the razor servers...
> it could also allow us to setup local razor caches for private networks that
> can bypass the razor servers all together...
http://www.stearns.org/razor-caching-proxy/ is what you're looking
for for the razor1 protocol.  The equivalent for razor2 is on hold pending
Jordan, is that still in the "finishing touches" stage?  *smile*
I'm betting that the infinite demands of getting a startup going put it on
the back burner.  Please let me know if I can help; if you need someone to
"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it
never will.  Find out just what people will submit to, and you have
found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed
upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either
words or blows, or with both.  The limits of tyrants are prescribed by
the endurance of those whom they oppress."