from n34.grp.scd.yahoo.com (n34.grp.scd.yahoo.com
    [66.218.66.102]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g7ME1MZ09279 for <zzzz@example.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:01:22 +0100

> Check it into the spambayes project.  SF's disks are cheap <wink>.
Perhaps more useful would be if Tim could check in the pickle(s?)
generated by one of his training runs, so that others can see how
Tim's training data performs against their own corpora.  This could
also be the starting point for a self-contained distribution (you've
got to start with *something*, and training with python-list data
seems just as good as anything else).
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7N3xOZ09392 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 04:59:24 +0100
No, hits=-5.5 required=7.0
	tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
	version=2.40-cvs

TP> A false positive *really* has to work hard then, eh?  The long
TP> quote of a Nigerian scam letter is one of the two that made
TP> it, and spamprob() looked at all this stuff before deciding it
TP> was spam:
Here's an interesting thing to test: discriminate words differently if
they are on a line that starts with `>' or, to catch styles like
above, that the first occurance on a line of < or > is > (to eliminate
html).
Then again, it may not be worth trying to un-false-positive that
Nigerian scam quote.
-Barry

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38B343C34
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 05:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:56:28 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7FItS713720 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:55:29 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17fPbK-0006RR-00; Thu,
    15 Aug 2002 11:44:06 -0700
from h-66-166-21-186.snvacaid.covad.net ([66.166.21.186]
    helo=cynosure.darkridge.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17fPaq-0000k3-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:43:36 -0700
(from jpr5@localhost) by cynosure.darkridge.com (8.11.6/8.11.5)
    id g7FIhX303168 for razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 15 Aug 2002
    11:43:33 -0700
Pursuant to US Code; Title 47; Chapter 5; Subchapter II; 227 any unsolicited commercial email to this address will be subject to a download and archival fee of US$500.  Pursuant to California Business & Professions Code; S17538.45 any email service provider involved in SPAM activities will be liable for statutory damages of US$50 per message, up to US$25,000 per day.  Pursuant to California Penal Code; S502 any unsolicited email sent to this address is in violation of Federal Law and is subject to fine and/or imprisonment.
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Aug 16 10:57:35 2002