Here are the new scores in the 2.40 branch (they may change, but they
Total of 3.5 which is better than 7.4, I suppose.
If they fixed their MSGID, it would help.  I suppose we could allow
comments without hurting spam detection too much, but I'm reluctant
(it's pretty bizarre to put a comment after the Message-ID header).
Can you open a bugzilla ticket for this one?

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95616F93
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:04:52 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:04:52 +0100 (IST)
from lugh.tuatha.org (postfix@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45])
    by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g978UXK24245 for
    <zzzz-ilug@example.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:30:33 +0100
from lugh.tuatha.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F953341DD; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 09:31:17 +0100 (IST)
from homer.jinny.ie (homer.jinny.ie [193.120.171.3]) by
    lugh.tuatha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E661340D5 for <ilug@linux.ie>;
    Mon,  7 Oct 2002 09:30:02 +0100 (IST)
from barney (fw.jinny.ie [193.120.171.2]) by homer.jinny.ie
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1157FC45 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Mon,
    7 Oct 2002 09:30:00 +0100 (IST)
from john by barney with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id
    17yTH7-0005Mi-00 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 09:30:01 +0100
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Oct  7 12:06:33 2002

On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Padraig Brady mentioned:
> OK I'm upgrading vorbis on my machine and I'm getting
> the following:
>
> # rpm -U libvorbis-* vorbis-tools-1.0-1.i386.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> 	libvorbisfile.so.0   is needed by SDL_mixer-1.2.0-4
> 	libvorbisfile.so.0   is needed by xmms-1.2.5-7
> 	libvorbisfile.so.0   is needed by tuxracer-0.61-5
>
> This is because the new libvorbis.rpm only has libvorbisfile.so.3
> So is this a problem in the other packages depending on
> a specific version (libvorbisfile.so.0) rather than on the
> generic libvorbis.so ?
This is a pain.
The only way you can resolve this, to my knowledge is to download the
original libvorbis rpm and the new one. Remove the old one, then do:
rpm -Uvh libvorbis-*
RPM then assumes that you want both versions installed at the same time,
and does so. Why you can't do this after you have one library already
installed is beyond me.
Kate
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie