from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE0D16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 10:56:12 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 10:56:12 +0100 (IST)
from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98815K06130 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:01:05 +0100
No, hits=-1016.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50
	version=2.50-cvs
From rssfeeds@jmason.org  Tue Oct  8 10:56:12 2002

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B66916F16
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 10:55:17 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g987avK05522 for
    <zzzz-rpm@example.com>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:36:57 +0100

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA4416F22
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  7 Oct 2002 12:02:39 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:02:39 +0100 (IST)
from cpu59.osdn.com (slashdot.org [64.28.67.73] (may be forged))
    by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g971xsK14100 for
    <jm-use-perl@jmason.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 02:59:54 +0100
from [10.2.181.14] (helo=perl.org) by cpu59.osdn.com with smtp
    (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17yN8Y-0006Mp-01 for <jm-use-perl@jmason.org>;
    Sun, 06 Oct 2002 21:56:46 -0400
From pudge@perl.org  Mon Oct  7 12:03:53 2002

* Security hole found in the Safe module
| Security hole found in the Safe module                             |
|   posted by rafael on Sunday October 06, @06:21 (modules)          |
[0]rafael writes "A security hole has been discovered in Safe.pm. When a
Safe compartment has already been used, there's no guarantee that it's
safe any longer, because there's a way for code executed within the Safe
compartment to alter its operation mask. (Thus, programs that use a Safe
compartment only once aren't affected by this bug.)" Read below for the