from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDDB440E2
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 10:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:35:24 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79EPIb06880 for
    <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:25:18 +0100
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA02980 for
    <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 03:28:53 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17czTX-0003bH-00; Thu,
    08 Aug 2002 19:26:03 -0700
from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([192.41.170.16]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17czSl-0002GF-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 08 Aug 2002 19:25:16 -0700
from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5])
    by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g7939XTB031771;
    Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:09:34 +0700 (ICT)
banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to
    on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f
Re: [SAtalk] Re: SA SQL Prefs and MIMEDefang
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  9 15:44:04 2002

> The main reason I'd like to stick with a milter-based approach is the
> ability to reject messages at the SMTP stage.  This way the recipient isn't
> bothered and the sender knows immediately that the message failed.  My
> understanding is that once it gets to Procmail, as far as the sender is
> concerned, it got through.  And since all our users connect via POP, moving
> things to another folder is not an option, so the only way to notify the
> recipient is to allow the message through or replace it with a summary.
I think the summary thingy, with a mail based retreive facility, is a
good alternative. You avoid false positive, only one email to list all
the spam you received in one day, and you have full per user pref.
Olivier
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk