On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:38:44AM -0700, Craig R . Hughes wrote:
> This is, I think the biggest fallacy here.  You don't have to
> block jack shit to get a high trust rating, you just have to
> confirm Razor's existing opinion on a large number of messages:
>
> if(check() == spam) then submit() else revoke()
>
> That algorithm boosts trust, but reduces the information in
> SpamNet by damping.
Again, this is not true. Only certain events (reports/revokes) for a spam
are rewarded and the algorithm for picking these up is based on many
different factors.
--
Vipul Ved Prakash          |   "The future is here, it's just not
Software Design Artist     |    widely distributed."
http://vipul.net/          |              -- William Gibson
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63543-2002Sep10.html
"MIAMI, Sept. 10 -- A two-gram rock of crack
cocaine was found inside the shoe of Florida
Gov. Jeb Bush's 25-year-old daughter by workers
at the central Florida rehabilitation center
where she is undergoing court-ordered drug
treatment, Orlando police said today.
Noelle Bush was not arrested because witnesses
would not give sworn statements, but the
incident is under investigation, according to
Orlando police spokesman Orlando Rolon."
Wow, the witnesses would not nark of a Bush girl in an era where there are
no mare restrictions on being held without a cause?
Imagine that...
-tom

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MFCqZ11700 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:12:52 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7FE3ED52; Thu, 22 Aug 2002
    11:13:01 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC6D3F694
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:04:15 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7MF4CB20210 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Thu, 22 Aug 2002
    11:04:12 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7MF4BY20206 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:04:11 -0400