On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 00:05, Matthias Saou wrote:
> It's 100% untested, although the build should be ok. The new menu was
> added, but some configuration files may be better with new or different
Looks good to me, just installed it, and ran a local scan, everything

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4543116F21
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  6 Sep 2002 11:34:38 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:34:38 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g869ZWC28256 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:35:40 +0100
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA19615 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:19:05 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17n7fN-0000e3-00; Thu,
    05 Sep 2002 18:12:09 -0700
from dhcp024-208-195-177.indy.rr.com ([24.208.195.177]
    helo=burgers.bubbanfriends.org) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17n7f8-0008CE-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu,
    05 Sep 2002 18:11:54 -0700
from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    burgers.bubbanfriends.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DD74001A1;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 20:11:56 -0500 (EST)
by burgers.bubbanfriends.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id
    074C64001A0; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 20:11:55 -0500 (EST)
from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    burgers.bubbanfriends.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00278C026A6;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 20:11:54 -0500 (EST)
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Sep  6 11:35:12 2002

And you were exactly the person I figured would do so. <G>
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:57PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > You might be better asking this on the spamassassin-talk list.  The folks
> > there will almost definitely have an answer for this.
> I posted a fairly lengthy complete answer to this problem and how to
> get around it in SA 2.41 on the spamassassin-talk list. :)