------- Additional Comments From alan@rdrop.com  2002-09-05 22:22 -------
I haven't tried 2.41 yet because it requires File::Spec, which barfs when
spamassassin tries to use it.  I haven't filed a bug yet because I suspect it's
because I'm still running 5.005 perl because of reported compatibility issues
with 5.6 and later, but I probably will because I think there's too much legacy
perl code to put up with major compatibility problems, and spamassassin didn't,
at least in the quickest of looks, say it needed a newer one.  The perl @ stuff
was bad enough...  but this is all a separate soapbox...

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0DC16F21
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Fri,  6 Sep 2002 15:24:19 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 15:24:19 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86A0mC30399 for
    <zzzz-deadbeef@example.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:00:49 +0100
from petting-zoo.net (IDENT:postfix@petting-zoo.net
    [64.166.12.219]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA16963 for
    <zzzz-deadbeef@example.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:26:57 +0100

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B57C16F17
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 10:52:52 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98JKUK30723 for <zzzz@example.com>;
    Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:20:31 +0100
No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.50-cvs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:51:54AM -0700, Elias wrote:
> So, given the apparent commonality of these occurances, companies appear
> to be losing a large amount of money by mailing these tiny checks out.
> Why can't they simply credit the account in question on the next bill?
> Granted, if an account has been closed there is no such option...
I've been waiting for Hettinga to regale us with one of his well-tuned
micro-cash-bearer-settlement-geodesic-finance rants. Bob, you are SO
disappointing me.
--
njl