No, hits=-15.9 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-5.0 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FOR_FREE,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_05_08,USER_AGENT,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

Shouldn't a politician know not to tell the truth? Odds he's impeached by
next Monday? [ob: no-clue-how-they-remove-mayors-in-italy]
Ouch. Ouch. Ouch.
------------
Get Sexier, Keep Husbands, Mayor Tells Wives
Wed Sep 4, 9:14 AM ET
MISSAGLIA, Italy (Reuters) - Husband's eyes wandering? Make yourself sexier.
At least that's the solution proposed by an Italian mayor -- and a woman
mayor at that.
Wives in the northern town of Missaglia had complained to mayor Marta
Casiraghi about a young woman who sunbathed topless on her terrace.
They complained that the men in the town of some 7,000 people were spending
too much time ogling, so they asked Casiraghi to order the woman to put her
clothes back on.
But the mayor, far from sympathizing, told the wives to get sexy if they
wanted to keep their men. "The girl was very pretty and was soaking up some
sun. Topless sunbathing is largely tolerated and widespread nowadays.
There's nothing we can do," Casiraghi told Il Nuovo, a web-based newspaper.
"Instead, I'd advise the wives to play their rival at her own game -- make
themselves more beautiful."

No, hits=-7.0 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MISSING_HEADERS,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.40-cvs

Dan Brickley wrote:
> Except that thanks to the magic of spam, it's usually some else's locale
yeah, physical mail makes more sense for physical locales.
> There are better technical solutions to privacy
> protection than sending a copy of the same message to everyone on the
> Internet, so the recipients can't be blamed for reading it.
Such as?
Anything equivalent will be spam, just not email spam.  Dump entry IPs for
an anonymizing network onto a public bulletin board that's used for other
purposes -- still spam.  Etc etc.
I'm not arguing against other solutions, I'm arguing that spam is speech.
If you let governments ban it, you're giving them the power to choose who
gets to speak.
- Lucas
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork