from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B85440D9
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 10:33:31 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:33:31 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79ENSb06684 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:23:28 +0100
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA03460 for
    <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 05:24:59 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17d1Es-0005Kp-00; Thu,
    08 Aug 2002 21:19:02 -0700
from vhost.swchs.org ([216.185.203.194]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17d1EQ-0005Wy-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu,
    08 Aug 2002 21:18:34 -0700
from WorldClient [127.0.0.1] by lerfjhax.com [127.0.0.1] with
    SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Thu, 08 Aug 2002 23:18:29 -0500
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Aug  9 15:33:52 2002

> Who loses in this case? Why? Neither party is inaccurate in their
> actions IMO. But someone's standing is going to get hurt because of it.
My question for the trust system is this. I signed up for a free account
on some website that gives me free access to a large compilation of data,
and in so doing have subscribed myself to their mailing list. The mailing
includes a list of new articles and books and so forth as well as a few
links to their book store.
This is consistently flagged as spam, even though I *agreed* to see it,
and I *want* to see what new articles there are, since some of them might
be interesting. Thus, since it is certifiably *not* spam (it even
includes a link to terminate your account), I revoke it. Even so, the
next mail is still flagged as spam.
Who is losing a trust rating here? If it is not unsolicited commercial e-
mail, it should not be reported by Razor as spam -- correct?
--Will
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users