from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0691A43C32
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 05:49:21 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:49:21 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7ELsi405599 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:54:44 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17f5zo-0003gx-00; Wed,
    14 Aug 2002 14:48:04 -0700
from h-66-134-120-173.lsanca54.covad.net ([66.134.120.173]
    helo=stealthgeeks.net) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim
    3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17f5yp-0007N0-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 14:47:03 -0700
from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
    14 Aug 2002 21:47:02 -0000
"Craig R . Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>,
	<razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 15 10:50:11 2002

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Vipul Ved Prakash wrote:
> > This is, I think the biggest fallacy here.  You don't have to
> > block jack shit to get a high trust rating, you just have to
> > confirm Razor's existing opinion on a large number of messages:
> > if(check() == spam) then submit() else revoke()
> > That algorithm boosts trust, but reduces the information in
Is there a point that you plan on releasing detailed information about
TeS, so we can stop engaging in idle speculation?
It's not my desire to second-guess you Vipul(however much my missives may
appear otherwise) or question the hard work you and the other
developers have put into the system, however it seems that every request
for such information has been met with silence.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C04143C47
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 05:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:49:29 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7EMnb407158 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:49:37 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17f6q4-0002hz-00; Wed,
    14 Aug 2002 15:42:04 -0700
from pcp01330322pcs.chrstn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.81.131.45]
    helo=dingus.sparklehouse.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17f6pZ-0005BW-00 for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed,
    14 Aug 2002 15:41:33 -0700
from [192.168.1.50] (helo=DARLA) by dingus.sparklehouse.com with
    smtp (Exim 6.66 #1) id 17f6pP-0007i2-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:41:23 -0400
RE: [Razor-users] Ricochet Question Actually
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 15 10:50:51 2002