from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FAC44158
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 11:22:02 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:22:02 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id E481E294177; Sun,  1 Sep 2002 21:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
from mithral.com (watcher.mithral.com [204.153.244.1]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B95FA294099 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Sun,  1 Sep 2002 21:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
No, hits=-9.9 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.40-cvs
From fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  2 16:22:28 2002

On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
>  > problems.... Why do most computer scientists insist on solving the
>  > same problems over and over again when there are some many more
>  > important and interesting problems (high level) to be solved ?????
>
> Amen!
Like what exactly? All the problems are in chemisty and physics and biology
and mathematics. We're just enablers :)
> Doing it in an (unecessarily) harder way does NOT make you more of a man
> (or less of a kiddie).
Yes, but doing it an order of magnitude or 2 easier does :) Which with the
way things are now, is not hard at all to do.
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
beberg@mithral.com

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F7644157
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 11:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:22:05 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 1FA91294185; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 00:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B663294099 for <FoRK@xent.com>;
    Mon,  2 Sep 2002 00:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
from Intellistation ([66.31.2.27]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id
    <20020902071920.PLEQ12451.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@Intellistation> for
    <FoRK@xent.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 07:19:20 +0000
No, hits=-9.0 required=7.0
	tests=FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      NOSPAM_INC,RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,
	      REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.40-cvs