from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271B243F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:24:07 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7TGInZ20012 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:18:50 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kRzk-0007Cu-00; Thu,
    29 Aug 2002 09:18:08 -0700
from mail.island.net ([199.60.19.4] helo=mimas.island.net) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17kRzR-0001SF-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:17:49 -0700
from nanaimo.island.net (IDENT:root@nanaimo.island.net
    [199.60.19.1]) by mimas.island.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id
    g7TGHkDR025680; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:17:46 -0700
from nanaimo.island.net (IDENT:rogersd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    nanaimo.island.net (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7TGHjME006951;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:17:45 -0700
(from rogersd@localhost) by nanaimo.island.net
    (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7TGHjgQ006949; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:17:45 -0700
Re: [SAtalk] UPPERCASE_* rules and foreign character sets
"Clayton, Nik [IT]" <nik.clayton@citigroup.com>,
	"'spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net'" <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>
<F58968066573D4118FC600508BCF7EDA0786128A@exchuk19.eu.ssmb.com>;
    from nik.clayton@citigroup.com on Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:37:02AM +0100
MIMEDefang 2.11 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash
    mimedefang)
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Aug 29 17:24:07 2002

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:37:02AM +0100, Clayton, Nik [IT] wrote:
> Have the UPPERCASE_* rules been tested on messages in non-English
> character sets, and/or where the message is MIME encoded in some way?
> I'm getting a lot of false positives on Japanese mail, and I think the
> encoding is responsible for triggering this rule.