On Thursday 05 September 2002 04:10 CET Mike Burger wrote:
> Just loaded up SA 2.40 from Theo's RPMs...spamassassin-2.40-1 and
> perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.40-1 on a RH 7.1 system with perl 5.6.1 running
> I'm getting messages that seem to indicate that SA can't find
> Sep  4 21:01:59 burgers spamd[17579]: Failed to run CTYPE_JUST_HTML
> SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(Can't locate object method
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" (perhaps you forgot to load
Perl doesn't complain that it can't find PerMsgStatus.pm but the function
check_for_content_type_just_html(). Do you probably have some old rules
files still lurking around? This test existed in 2.31 but is gone/was

from ts12-167.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO example.com)
    (194.125.172.167) by relay05.indigo.ie (qp 67309) with SMTP;
    5 Sep 2002 11:37:56 -0000
by example.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0C81E16F21;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:22:05 +0100 (IST)
from example.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by example.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 09402F7B1; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:22:05 +0100 (IST)
No, hits=-7.3 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,FOR_FREE,HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05
	version=2.50-cvs

"Kerry Nice" said:
> What about some reality check rules.  Yeah, you can pack in lots of things
> into the header to try and get some negative points, but do they all make
> sense in combination.  Can you have a Pine message id in the same header
> with an Outlook Express one or a Mutt User-Agent?
Yes, this is a big bonus of meta rules (new in 2.40); we can now
e.g. check for an Outlook-style forwarded message, and not give
it negative points unless it contains other signs of being from
Outlook.
> I think the headers should be paid special attention to.  The message
> content of something from the NY Times or Lockergnome might look spammy, but
> usually they don't forge or fake anything in the header.  Tone down the
> negative scores and ding them extra for any obvious forgeries.
When we get more (good) "nice" tests, the GA will assign lower
scores to them.  I think the current problem is that there are
very few really good nice tests in the current rulebase, and lots
of +ve tests that those newsletters hit, giving the GA a big
problem to solve.
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk