> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 10:36, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > 1) I've had to install a Red Hat Linux 6.2 server because of an old
> > proprietary IVR software that doesn't work on newer releases :-( So
> > I've recompiled both the latest apt and openssh packages for it, and
> > they are now available with a complete "os, updates & freshrpms" apt
> > repository at apt.freshrpms.net, for those who might be interested.
> Gack. Did you try 7.3 with the compat-glibc first? Or does it require an
It requires a 2.2 kernel, plus antique just-about-everything :-/ Real crap!
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux kernel 2.4.18-10acpi

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3254416F20
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 10:51:28 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:51:28 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g996jAK22972 for
    <zzzz-rpm@spamassassin.taint.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:45:10 +0100
from bennew01.localdomain (pD900DDF4.dip.t-dialin.net
    [217.0.221.244]) by egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id
    g996aAf01341 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:36:10 +0200
from bennew01.localdomain (bennew01.localdomain [192.168.3.1])
    by bennew01.localdomain (8.12.5/linuxconf) with SMTP id g996a33S019398 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:36:03 +0200
customized linux smp kernel 2.4* on i686
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Wed Oct  9 10:52:07 2002

> Ick.  Perhaps this is why Red Hat turned the bytecode interpreter off.
> It may improve non-antialiased rendering, but only at the expense of
> making a mess of antialiased rendering.
> This may come down to a matter of personal aesthetics, but for my part,
> I'm going back to Red Hat's standard packages with the bytecode
Yes, confirmed, but for my part, I'm using mostly non-antialiased fonts
they are true ugly without the bytecode interpreter enabled.
Remember my stupid request about your RPM ;-)