Probably a private sequence has gotten set, the highlighting only
If "scan unseen" works as you'd expect, but highlighting doesn't,

from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7UDpYZ27586 for <zzzz-scoop@spamassassin.taint.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 14:51:34 +0100

from lists.ironclad.net.au ([203.30.247.12]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7UFbiZ31242 for
    <zzzz@example.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:37:45 +0100

(This list is sponsored by Ironclad Networks http://www.ironclad.net.au/)
Hello!
Friday, August 30, 2002, 7:25:31 PM Bob Musser <BobM@dbsinfo.com> wrote:
[lost]
BM> I'd like to swap with someone also using Simple DNS to take
BM> advantage of the trusted zone file transfer option.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you speaking about limiting AXFR requests on IP address basis? If
yes, then virtually every BIND-equipped DNS server in the world will
be suitable for your needs.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)     http://www.andris.msk.ru/
--
To Unsubscribe: <dns-swap-off@lists.ironclad.net.au>
Sponsor & Host: Ironclad Networks <http://www.ironclad.net.au/>

from ts13-182.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO spamassassin.taint.org)
    (194.125.173.182) by relay06.indigo.ie (qp 32637) with SMTP;
    17 Sep 2002 16:50:45 -0000
by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4F4EA16F03;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:50:28 +0100 (IST)
from spamassassin.taint.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 4D6C1F7B1; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 17:50:28 +0100 (IST)

Gary Lawrence Murphy said:
> >>>>> "S" == Stephen D Williams <sdw@lig.net> writes:
>     S> A) Which religion is it that can claim no foul actions in its
>     S> past?  Certainly not Christianity, Islam, etc.
> Rastafari.
> That is, if you concede that of the two founding branches, only the
> one founded by the Nyabingi were legit and the others were
> thinly-veneered anti-colonial hooligans.
> There is also Vietnamese Buddhism, unless you count setting fire to
> oneself as a "foul action".
What about Tibetan Buddhism BTW?  They seem like an awfully nice bunch
of chaps (and chapesses).
> When we launched the Native Net in 1989, one of the first things we
> noticed on networking aboriginal groups around the world is that the
> British Army, with the US Army as a proxy by extension, were the
> common thread.  Where neither was present (physically or through
> influence) there /tended/ to be less violence.
>
> The issue in Ireland is complex, but rest assured that religious
> aspects are only a co-incidence of the invader/colonials being
> predominantly members of the Royal-headed Anglicans and the aboriginal
> population being predominantly members of the Pope-headed Catholics.
> The conflict itself has nothing to do with ideology or practice, since
> the Anglican Church is a near-identical clone of Catholicism.
>
> (now I bet that's going to attract some healthy debate ;)
Man, I'm not going *there* again ;)  I'll agree, though, that the ideology
or practices of the religions have very little to do with the conflict.
> The same is true of street-gangs: When people are disenfranchised,
> it's easier to offer them the Triad as a new family.  You get
> cellphones, cars, a dry place to live.  Triad, biker gangs, mafia, the
> IRA, Al Queda ... we've been fighting the War on Terrorism for as long
> as there's been commerce, so you'd think we'd /realize/ that
> escalation of violence is not a solution.
Well said!
--j.