>   | Ever tried to get MH to *not* have a 'pseq' sequence?
> I'm guessing that that's the sequence that you have "pick" create
> As I recall it, it has no default sequence name, so the sequence names
> that people use will tend to vary from person to person won't they
> (except as MH configurations move around institutions by osmosis).
> I've always used "sel" for that purpose.
BTW, it's kinda amusing for a short while to show the cur sequence.  Watching

No, hits=-299.2 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,T_URI_COUNT_1_2
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-6.5 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.50-cvs

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A27116EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 18:01:33 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:01:33 +0100 (IST)
from auth02.nl.egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g14D2L808736 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:02:22 GMT
from gaupe.sunnmore.net (c188s126h1.upc.chello.no
    [62.179.177.188]) by auth02.nl.egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with SMTP id
    g14D0M317622 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:00:22 +0100
(qmail 28308 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 13:00:26 -0000
from ekorn.sunnmore.no (HELO sunnmore.net) (10.0.0.1) by
    gaupe.sunnmore.net with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 13:00:26 -0000
No, hits=-8.8 required=7.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Mon Sep  9 18:01:33 2002

> Didn't think before sending... So I didn't realize that Reply-To was to
> the list and not to the sender (as it usually is).
How about removing the reply-to to the list?

> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com] On Behalf Of
James
> Rogers
> Subject: Re: The Curse of India's Socialism
>
> On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 15:01, Ian Andrew Bell wrote:
> > They
> > finished their routine with the a quadruple lutz -- laying off
> > hundreds of thousands of workers when it all came crashing down.
>
> So what?  Nobody is guaranteed employment.  Laying people off is not a
> crime nor is it immoral.  Companies don't exist to provide employment,
> nor should they.  The closest we have to such a thing in the US is a
> Government Job, and look at the quality THAT breeds.
And further, why focus on the fact they were laid off and not on the
fact they were hired in the first place?
BTW: I saw someone claim that aside from the efficiency of the market
there were also gains to society from irrational behavior.
If a society has business people that systematically overestimate their
chances, that is bad for the businessmen but on net a big gain for
society.  On the social level, the law of averages works to societies
benefit in a manner it can't for an individual.
A key reason, in this view, that the US wound up outperforming England
was that the English investors were too rational for their societies own
good.
(Except, of course, when US investors were bilking them to build canals
and railroads over here.  Thanks, guys.)
=====================
Applied to telecom: a lot of dark wire (glass) and innovation will
eventually be used for pennies on the dollar, the benefits to society
and the costs to the investors.