from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8J2feC01001 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 03:41:41 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633B3EE40; Wed, 18 Sep 2002
    22:42:02 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E523EA54
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:41:41 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8J2ffW30587 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 18 Sep 2002
    22:41:41 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8J2feh30583 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:41:40 -0400
No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D34417D
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:57:20 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id CDE8629419B; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
from smtp1.auracom.net (smtp1.auracom.net [165.154.140.23]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD88B294196 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Sun, 11 Aug 2002 18:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
from maya.dyndns.org (ts5-022.ptrb.interhop.net
    [165.154.190.86]) by smtp1.auracom.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id
    g7C0c2W03139 for <fork@xent.com>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 20:38:03 -0400 (EDT)
by maya.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id C78831C3B6;
    Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:03:06 -0400 (EDT)
From fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Aug 12 11:11:30 2002

>>>>> "D" == Damien Morton <damien.morton@acm.org> writes:
D> An alternative, which I have found very effective in reducing
D> my spam levels, is to reject emails to multiple or undisclosed
D> recipients, unless from someone in my whitelist (In this case,
D> subscribed members).
I often use just such a posting to send emails to lists but also to
send them to private individuals who need not be publically exposed on
the list. This is what BCC is for.
Where my spam filter draws the line is for emails which /only/ have
undisclosed recipients, or an obviously bogus recipient.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@teledyn.com> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork