from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F27F16F20
	for <jm@localhost>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 21:52:35 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:35 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 231932940E9; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net
    [64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0852229409E for
    <fork@xent.com>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
    7 Sep 2002 13:40:16 -0000
From fork-admin@xent.com  Sat Sep  7 21:53:26 2002

If it's unwritten, how'm I supposed to know unless someone CALLS me up and
tells me/  hint hint.  LOL  (:  Well, I reckon it's a written rule now,
since it's on the internet in text format w/ your name attached, but then
again, when have I ever followed any damned rules???  (:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote:
> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of CDale
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:21 PM
> Cc: bitbitch@magnesium.net; Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote:
> > From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of CDale
> > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM
> > Cc: Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> > Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
> > I dunno, BB.  Women who like to be thought of this way should have the
> > right to choose to be treated this way.  Men too...  ahem.  (:  My boy
> > cleans, washes clothes, cooks, fixes stuff, etc, and works the same number
> > of hours I do, sometimes more, if he has to catch up with me.  (:  I
> > close him because he is industrious and creative, and because he
> > unfailingly makes my bed the minute I get out of it.  And boy #2 will be
> > here soon to help boy #1 with other things such as pedicures,  backrubs,
> > and sure, fucking.  LOL! (along with the aforementioned "chores") Adam can
> > have his cake and eat it too, if he can only find the right girl who has
> > the same beliefs about gender  roles that he has. Of course, he has NO
> > clue where to look, so we will be constantly laughing at him while he
> > P.S. the numbers do not in any way indicate importance or favor -- only
> > the order in which they move into my house.  -smiles at chris-
> > P.S. #2.  I'm moving.   Going to New Orleans.  Can't handle any more cab
> > driving.  The summer sucked here on the MS Gulf Coast, instead of rocking
> > like it normally does.  Wish me luck.  I'm going to look for another
> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
> > > Thursday, September 05, 2002, 11:33:18 PM, you wrote:
> > > ALB> So, you're saying that product bundling works? Good point.
> > > Sometimes I wish I was still in CA.  You deserve a good beating every
> > > so often...  (anyone else want to do the honors?)
> > > ALB> And how is this any different from "normal" marriage exactly? Other
> > > ALB> that the woman not only gets a man, but one in a country where both
> > > ALB> her offspring will have actual opportunities? Oh and the lack of
> > > ALB> "de-feminized, over-sized, self-centered, mercenary-minded"
> > > Mmkay.  For the nth time Adam, we don't live in the land of
> > > Adam-fantasy.  Women actually are allowed to do things productive,
> > > independent and entirely free of their male counterparts.  They aren't
> > > forced to cook and clean and merely be sexual vessels.   Sometimes,
> > > and this will come as a shock to you, no doubt, men and women even
> > > find -love- (which is the crucial distinction between this system) and
> > > they marry one another for the satisfaction of being together.   I
> > > know, far-fetched and idealistically crazy as it is, but such things
> > > do happen.   I can guarantee you, if my mother was approached by my
> > > father, and 25 years ago, he commented on her cleaning ability as a
> > > motivator for marrying her, we would not be having this conversation
> > > If guys still have silly antequated ideas about 'women's role' then
> > > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce.   Again, these
> > > situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the relationship
> > > is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a prostitute he
> > > doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't impoverished
> > > and teeming with AIDS.  A contract, versus a true love-interest
> > > Egh.  I really need to stop analyzing your posts to this extent.   I
> > > ALB>   http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
> > "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn
> "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn