On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:11:47AM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> people? Either these folks are social misfits who have no understanding of
> human interactions (else they would try more constructive means to get their
> message across) or they are just out to get their rocks off regardless of
> how it affects other people, and that is immoral at best and downright evil
> at worst.
Are you kidding? It was fucking BRILLIANT. Do you know what exposure that got
them? They sat perfectly so that the cameras could focus on the mildly
exasperated Rumsfeld and their "UN Inspections not war" banner. That picture
will be dominating the news cycles in China, Iraq, Russia, Germany, and
France, at least. For goodness sakes, you're arguing about it on FoRK. In
politics by sound-bite, those two rude hags kicked ass and took names.
For the record, I don't think they even got arrested, which is a shame. It
is part of the game -- make an ass of yourself, get your point on the nightly
news, spend a couple days in the clink for disorderly.
--
njl

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7D716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:15:27 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:15:27 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8KDVtC07056 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:31:55 +0100
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id DE396294177; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
from imo-d10.mx.aol.com (imo-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.42]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6519529409C for <fork@xent.com>;
    Fri, 20 Sep 2002 06:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
from ThosStew@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.11.)
    id k.53.1c91dda8 (3310); Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
From fork-admin@xent.com  Fri Sep 20 16:15:28 2002

In a message dated 9/19/2002 3:45:45 PM, dl@silcom.com writes:
>make a good, original, argument for it.
I can't imagine any other kind of argument for nuking gay baby whales for
jesus. But do you mean nuking baby gay whales who are for jesus; or nuking