from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC3616EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 19:27:37 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:37 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89EPOC18907 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:25:26 +0100
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 0C4B72942DF; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 07:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
from venus.phpwebhosting.com (venus.phpwebhosting.com
    [64.29.16.27]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C2012940EC for
    <fork@xent.com>; Mon,  9 Sep 2002 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
from unknown (HELO hydrogen.leitl.org) (217.80.40.112) by
    venus.phpwebhosting.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 14:24:01 -0000
from localhost (eugen@localhost) by hydrogen.leitl.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89ENvB07381; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:23:58 +0200
No, hits=-10.9 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs
From fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  9 19:27:37 2002

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> a linearly greater number of sexual partners on the order of 1.5-2X.  But
> then again, it not a monolithic or homogeneous community.  Who knows?
Did I claim "all gay people are hyperpromiscuous"? For what this is worth,
I would claim they're considerably more promiscuous on the average than
your average het. My utterly unscientific, unsubstatiated claim is that
the typical male would *like* to be considerably more promiscous than your
average female (ay, and here's the rub. pray don't forget the kleenex).
Look up different reproduction strategies, due to basic hardware
difference (sexual dimorphism). You'd do that too if it happened to you.
Once you go past the first three of four pages of hysterical propaganda on
Google you might actually run into real studies. Anyone game? I have to
work (well, pretend to).
> 3K is utter shite.
This is getting better and better. You know 3K is utter shite how? You
just feel the number can't be right, yes? Deep inside? I'm way overposting
today, but I find this entire exchange hee-lay-rious.