Today's error(received multiple times) was:
Jul 23 21:16:46.597147 report[98558]: [ 1] razor-report error: reportit:
Error 213 while authenticating, aborting.
I really like the concept of Razor but I find myself wondering if it's
really a good idea for the developers to be passing off what appears
to be alpha-quality software as production-ready....
Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CC7440CD
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:22:49 -0400 (EDT)
from dogma.slashnull.org [212.17.35.15]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:22:49 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g6OELE418307 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:21:14 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17XMu1-0007Rr-00; Wed,
    24 Jul 2002 07:14:09 -0700
from 70.muca.bstn.bstnmaco.dsl.att.net ([12.98.14.70]
    helo=pulse.fsckit.net) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher
    TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17XMtb-0004Jf-00
    for <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:13:44 -0700
from twells by pulse.fsckit.net with local (Exim) id
    17XMtY-00010R-00; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:13:40 -0400
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Wed Jul 24 15:22:51 2002

Patrick <patrick@stealthgeeks.net> is thought to have said:
> Today's error(received multiple times) was:
> Jul 23 21:16:46.597147 report[98558]: [ 1] razor-report error: reportit:
> Error 213 while authenticating, aborting.
I believe this is fixed (or at least there's a workaround in place to try
> I really like the concept of Razor but I find myself wondering if it's
> really a good idea for the developers to be passing off what appears
> to be alpha-quality software as production-ready....
And where does it say production-ready? http://razor.sourceforge.net says at
June 13, 2002 - Vipul's Razor v2 released! The first beta of Vipul's Razor
v2 is now available for public download.
Likewise Vipul's announcement post about v2 to this list states that it is