from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF46B43F9B
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 07:29:13 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:29:13 +0100 (IST)
from prune.flirble.org (prune.flirble.org [195.40.6.30]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7UFv4Z32113 for
    <zzzz-ntk@spamassassin.taint.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:57:04 +0100
From tips@spesh.com  Mon Sep  2 12:29:16 2002

No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT,
	      X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

Wow, three replies already, all recommending ssh. Thanks!
- Joe
Back in my day, they didn't have ssh. Then again, back in my day,
they didn't have firewalls. And I still miss X10's active icons.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FDF43C32
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:56:06 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:56:06 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7LEtjZ30054 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 15:55:46 +0100
from ex02.idirect.net (ex02.idirect.net [208.226.76.48]) by
    egwn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g7LEolJ20550 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:50:47 +0200
from quoted-printable to 8bit by egwn.net id
    g7LEolJ20550
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Wed Aug 21 15:56:06 2002

> From: Torsten Bronger [mailto:bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 7:36 AM
> On Mittwoch, 21. August 2002 08:37 schrieben Sie:
> > Have you tried rebuilding your package on a system that has
> > no) .rpmmacros file? Does it still build (and
> It can't, because then %{texhash} is not defined.  But how
> The problem exists when someone wants to install many RPMs, among them
> mine.  Let's assume that every package that adds files to TeX's
> file tree runs texhash or equivalent.  This would be a desaster!
> There are only two solutions: (1) When installing many packages
> (maybe in context of a complete system installation), %post etc.
> are skipped and a complete update script is launched after *all*
> packages have been installed.  (2) I leave the taxhash thing out.
> But then the user would have to do it.