from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC18B43C34
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 05:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:57:41 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7JHb1Z02595 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:37:02 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17gqMr-0004he-00; Mon,
    19 Aug 2002 10:31:05 -0700
from fly.hiwaay.net ([208.147.154.56] helo=mail.hiwaay.net) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17gqLp-00009r-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 10:30:02 -0700
by bsd.havk.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 857671A786;
    Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:29:53 -0500 (CDT)
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Tue Aug 20 10:57:41 2002

On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 10:17:26AM -0700, Chad Norwood wrote:
>   The way Razor breaks down mail is simple.  If a mail contains MIME
>   boundaries it is split on those boundaries, each MIME part is considered
>   when marking the mail as spam.
This isn't a MIME message that it is breaking down though.  The
message as sent to me is just a regular one part, non-MIME message.
The contents of the message among other things is a forwarded message
(inline not as an attachment) that happens to have MIME parts.
>   In 2.14, there are different 'logic methods' for detecting spam.
>   The default method 5 requires all non-contention parts to be spam for
I see 1-4 documented in the manpage.  2 looked like a good candidate
but the manpage states that only 1, 3, and 4 are on by default.  No
mention of method 5 though that I can see.
>   the mail to be marked as spam.  A part is considered under
>   contention if its not clear if its spam are not, and is relatively
>   rare.
>
>   Sounds like you are not using 2.14, or maybe you're misinterpreting
Actually I am using 2.14.
>   the log files.  Feel free to send me the log files if you think
>   there is a bug.
>
>   Also, as jordan says, if you get a legit mail marked as spam (based
>   on whatever MIME stuff is going on), you should revoke it (which sends
>   all parts in) so TeS can take care of business.
I have to run off to a meeting but I'll send you a copy of the logs
and the message that triggered as SPAM when I get back.  I'll also
revoke it along with the other 3 similar messages and the Security
Advisory that were wrongly called SPAM this morning.
Thanks.
-steve
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
Razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users