from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E12716F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:02:11 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:02:11 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (ns2.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8JApkC16151 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:51:47 +0100
from zeus.scania.co.za ([196.41.10.170]) by egwn.net
    (8.11.6/8.11.6/EGWN) with ESMTP id g8JAmHf13834 for
    <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:48:18 +0200
from leenx.co.za ([10.1.1.130]) by zeus.scania.co.za
    (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g8JAgWC10724 for <rpm-list@freshrpms.net>;
    Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:42:36 +0200
No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Thu Sep 19 13:02:12 2002

> PS: Yup, I'm back from my holidays ;-)
I hope you did not miss us at all ... ;-0
> I think I'll use this "--with <whatever>" switch more and more where
Mmm, great stuff ... Now to get the RedHat Samba packager to do the same
I have used there spec file and fun a few problems in it, and one of them
was just hashing out things for other use ...
Now to get to grips with the Kernel ... still have not found and easy way to
rebuild the Kernel without having to wait and hour for it to generate the

No, hits=-5.5 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE
	version=2.50-cvs

Once upon a time, C.Lee wrote :
>  > I think I'll use this "--with <whatever>" switch more and more where
>  > possible.
> 	Mmm, great stuff ... Now to get the RedHat Samba packager to do the
> 	same thing ...
I'm sure that if you file a bugzilla entry with a relevant patch against
the spec file, chances of getting the change done are on your side ;-)
> 	I have used there spec file and fun a few problems in it, and one
> 	of them was just hashing out things for other use ...
>
> 	Now to get to grips with the Kernel ... still have not found and
> 	easy way to rebuild the Kernel without having to wait and hour for
>       it to generate the headers for all arch ... arrrrhhhh ...
The problem is that "--with <foo> --without <bar>" is clearly not meant to
change deeply the way a package is built. Its use would be more like
enabling/disabling gpg, ldap, whateversql support in packages as it's not
possible to use something like "--with-<foo>=<bar>" which could be used for
a much wider scope.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla) running Linux kernel 2.4.18-10
Load : 0.00 0.12 0.32, AC on-line, battery charging: 100% (4:47)
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list