No, hits=-4.4 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,FOR_FREE,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-13.1 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,FOR_FREE,
	      HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-5.7 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-12.5 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,HABEAS_SWE,
	      IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_KMAIL,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

On Wednesday 11 September 2002 16:19 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> Malte S. Stretz said:
>[...]
> > I think we should even add new (GA'd) rules to 2.4x (and/or remove old
> > ones) and tag a new 2.50 only if we have a bunch of features worth a
> > "dangerous" big update. I'd say: Yes, you should expect 2.42 and also
> > 2.43+ (but update to 2.41 now).
>
> I would think adding new rules to, or removing broken rules from, 2.4x
> would require some discussion first.  but new GA'd scores are definitely
> worth putting in, as the ones there are too wild.
I think my mail wasn't very clear ;-) My point was that we should continue
releasing new rules and removing broken ones (all based on discussions on
this list of course) in the 2.4 branch instead of creating a new 2.5 branch
everytime we have a bunch of new rules.
A new branch should be openend only if (big) new features are introduced
(eg. Bayes) or the interface has changed (spam_level_char=x). As the rules
are under fluent development, the user has to update quite regularly. But
currently he couldn't be shure if the new release will break anything in
his setup (like -F going away). So if we say "the branches are stable to
the outside and just improved under the surface but you have to watch out
when you update to a new minor version number", users and sysadmins could
be less reluctant to update.
All just IMHO :o)
Malte
P.S.: I'll be away from my box and my mail account for one week, starting
tomorrow. So happy coding for the next week :-)
--
--- Coding is art.
--