In message <200210091843.OAA01268@hippolyta.crd.ge.com>, Kevin Kenny said:
It absolutely can be done from .forward.  I am in the same situation as you,

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855F416F69
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 22:40:58 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 22:40:58 +0100 (IST)
from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g99JcRK18524 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:38:31 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943A042A07; Wed,  9 Oct 2002
    15:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFA4429A8
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 15:25:29 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g99JPSL22137 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 9 Oct 2002
    15:25:28 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g99JPSf22129 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:25:28 -0400
from ka.graffl.net (ka.graffl.net [193.154.165.8]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g99J5cX23923 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:05:40 -0400
from fsck.waldner.priv.at (fsck.waldner.priv.at
    [213.225.31.166]) by ka.graffl.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id
    g99JPIgM006081 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:25:18 +0200
from fsck.intern.waldner.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    fsck.waldner.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id
    g99JPGl9001535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168
    verify=FAIL) for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:25:17 +0200
(from waldner@localhost) by fsck.intern.waldner.priv.at
    (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id g99JPGfJ001534 for exmh-users@redhat.com;
    Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:25:16 +0200
No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs
From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Wed Oct  9 22:42:09 2002