from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A6716EFC
	for <jm@localhost>; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 21:52:32 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:32 +0100 (IST)
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id C6F7E2940D8; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
from homer.perfectpresence.com (unknown [209.123.207.194]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B0D29409E for <fork@xent.com>;
    Sat,  7 Sep 2002 06:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
from adsl-157-233-109.jax.bellsouth.net ([66.157.233.109]
    helo=regina) by homer.perfectpresence.com with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id
    17nfLB-0006QR-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 09:09:33 -0400
"CDale" <cdale@techmonkeys.net>,
	"Geege Schuman" <geege@barrera.org>
From fork-admin@xent.com  Sat Sep  7 21:53:25 2002

Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:21 PM
Cc: bitbitch@magnesium.net; Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote:
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM
> Cc: Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
> I dunno, BB.  Women who like to be thought of this way should have the
> right to choose to be treated this way.  Men too...  ahem.  (:  My boy
> cleans, washes clothes, cooks, fixes stuff, etc, and works the same number
> of hours I do, sometimes more, if he has to catch up with me.  (:  I
> close him because he is industrious and creative, and because he
> unfailingly makes my bed the minute I get out of it.  And boy #2 will be
> here soon to help boy #1 with other things such as pedicures,  backrubs,
> and sure, fucking.  LOL! (along with the aforementioned "chores") Adam can
> have his cake and eat it too, if he can only find the right girl who has
> the same beliefs about gender  roles that he has. Of course, he has NO
> clue where to look, so we will be constantly laughing at him while he
> P.S. the numbers do not in any way indicate importance or favor -- only
> the order in which they move into my house.  -smiles at chris-
> P.S. #2.  I'm moving.   Going to New Orleans.  Can't handle any more cab
> driving.  The summer sucked here on the MS Gulf Coast, instead of rocking
> like it normally does.  Wish me luck.  I'm going to look for another
> > Thursday, September 05, 2002, 11:33:18 PM, you wrote:
> > ALB> So, you're saying that product bundling works? Good point.
> > Sometimes I wish I was still in CA.  You deserve a good beating every
> > so often...  (anyone else want to do the honors?)
> > ALB> And how is this any different from "normal" marriage exactly? Other
> > ALB> that the woman not only gets a man, but one in a country where both
> > ALB> her offspring will have actual opportunities? Oh and the lack of
> > ALB> "de-feminized, over-sized, self-centered, mercenary-minded"
> > Mmkay.  For the nth time Adam, we don't live in the land of
> > Adam-fantasy.  Women actually are allowed to do things productive,
> > independent and entirely free of their male counterparts.  They aren't
> > forced to cook and clean and merely be sexual vessels.   Sometimes,
> > and this will come as a shock to you, no doubt, men and women even
> > find -love- (which is the crucial distinction between this system) and
> > they marry one another for the satisfaction of being together.   I
> > know, far-fetched and idealistically crazy as it is, but such things
> > do happen.   I can guarantee you, if my mother was approached by my
> > father, and 25 years ago, he commented on her cleaning ability as a
> > motivator for marrying her, we would not be having this conversation
> > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce.   Again, these
> > situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the relationship
> > is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a prostitute he
> > doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't impoverished
> > and teeming with AIDS.  A contract, versus a true love-interest
> > Egh.  I really need to stop analyzing your posts to this extent.   I