>     From:        Chris Garrigues <cwg-dated-1030460647.7351a3@DeepEddy.Com>
>   | hmmm, I assume you're going to report this to the nmh folks?
> Yes, I will, sometime, after I look at the nmh sources and see what
> But we really want exmh to operate with all the versions of nmh that
> exist, don't we?   The patch to have exmh do the right thing, whether this
> bug exists, or not, is trivial, so I'd suggest including it.
> I have no idea why the sequences were being added after the message list
> before, not that it should make any difference to nmh (or MH).   But since
> I stopped doing that, the variable "msgs" isn't really needed any more,
> rather than assigning $pick(msgs) to msgs, and then using $msgs the code
> could just use $pick(msgs) where $msgs is now used.   This is just a
> frill though, so I didn't change that.

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QI4SZ03731 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:04:32 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE003F362; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:04:26 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5FB3F407
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:01:02 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7QI0wM26240 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:00:58 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QI0wY26236 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:00:58 -0400

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7667244155
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:44:38 +0100 (IST)
from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7QIfLZ04793 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:41:22 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC48A3F03A; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:41:20 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5753F3D3
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:39:59 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7QIduZ10272 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 26 Aug 2002
    14:39:56 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QIdtY10268 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:39:55 -0400
from austin-jump.vircio.com (jump-austin.vircio.com
    [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7QIP3l28717
    for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:25:03 -0400
from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with
    qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4219. . Clean. Processed in 0.321256
    secs); 26/08/2002 13:39:54
from deepeddy.vircio.com (@[10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with
    SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 26 Aug 2002 18:39:54 -0000
from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com)
    (?Eb56NnaDnu2iOMAsaAJvGe2zQ07H1k7j?@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 26 Aug 2002 18:39:50 -0000
No, hits=-11.2 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,MULTIPART_SIGNED,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_LOOP
	version=2.40-cvs
From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Mon Aug 26 19:44:41 2002