No, hits=-4.9 required=7.0
	tests=ASCII_FORM_ENTRY,AWL,INVALID_MSGID,IN_REP_TO,
	      KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs

No, hits=-7.9 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,
	      KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.50-cvs

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AFD16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:03:28 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:03:28 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g8CDChC32028 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:12:43 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pTfa-0007C9-00; Thu,
    12 Sep 2002 06:06:06 -0700
from dsl-65-187-227-177.telocity.com ([65.187.227.177]
    helo=purestmail.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim
    3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pTfO-0002KB-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:05:54 -0700
from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2] verified) by purestmail.com
    (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 205148 for
    spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:05:51 -0400
CTM PowerMail 4.0 carbon <http://www.ctmdev.com>
No, hits=-6.0 required=7.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.50-cvs
From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Sep 12 15:03:28 2002

>Anyway I'm making good progress and my implementation works reasonably
>well.  It now seems blindingly clear that we want a tightly-integrated
>implementation of Naive Bayes spam/nonspam classification.  There are
>still some things about how to do this right inside SA that I still am
This is very good news! Will this allow for individual spam word file
preferences when spamassassin is running on a mailserver for multiple
users? This would be an outstanding addition if it can be done. Thanks