> From:  Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
> Date:  Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:15:11 +0200
>
> My feeling of this is that we really do not want to have a
> Ftoc_ClearCurrent, but rather just a RescanLine and the caller had
> better know the line or msgid. That routine shoud just put in the '+'
> if the line/msg in question happened to be the cur msg. Thoughts?
Intuitively, that sounds right to me.  It does also call "tag remove", so
you'll have to make sure that gets set correctly as well.
I think any changes that make it behave more intuitively are a good thing even
if they mean we have something else to fix.  Of course, that attitude is why
I've been fixing exmh bugs for 3 weeks.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701		+1 512 374 0500
World War III:  The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1834B440C8
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:06:04 -0400 (EDT)
from dogma.slashnull.org [212.17.35.15]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:06:04 +0100 (IST)
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6MIvV417074 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:57:32 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316453F2DC; Mon, 22 Jul 2002
    14:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC613EAC0
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:31 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g6MItV313629 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 22 Jul 2002
    14:55:31 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6MItVR13625 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:31 -0400
from austin-jump.vircio.com
    (IDENT:6rqRFid/zuX7QFe0/i8AmXxLspjmM84u@jump-austin.vircio.com
    [192.12.3.99]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6MIi0s16294
    for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:44:01 -0400
from cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com by localhost.localdomain with
    qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4213. . Clean. Processed in 0.324356
    secs); 22/07/2002 13:55:30
from deepeddy.vircio.com (@[10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by austin-jump.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with
    SMTP for <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 22 Jul 2002 18:55:30 -0000
from localhost (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com)
    (?WNn+kWdMvop03Bwu+i91Rp4AwHi2tYbD?@[127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender
    <cwg-exmh@DeepEddy.Com>) by localhost (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; 22 Jul 2002 18:55:25 -0000
Re: folders moving around in the unseen window
From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Mon Jul 22 20:06:05 2002