On Thursday 18 July 2002 14:49, Ray Kelly wrote:
> one basic option that I know of is Squidalyser, http://ababa.org/
> This doesn't do everything that you want but I've found
> it useful myself on a number of fronts
> Now it won't hive off things that have been downloaded but
> it your cache is so tuned and you've got the dick space you
> can keep some rather large objects in that.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0430947C7A
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 07:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for zzzz@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 12:42:48 +0100 (IST)
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g82AaFZ28780 for
    <zzzz-ilug@spamassassin.taint.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:36:15 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA30726; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:35:06 +0100
from athens.itsmobile.com by [193.95.181.146] via smtpd (for
    lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) with SMTP; 2 Sep 2002 10:26:06 UT
from quoted-printable to 8bit by lugh.tuatha.org id
    LAA30670
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Sep  2 13:13:12 2002

1. A Linux server running with a modem for internet connectivity and an
2. Other LAN pcs with ethernet cards, using the Linux server for
Basically, I want to route any non LAN traffic through the ppp0.
I've got some of the way, but like a similar post earlier about modem
problems, when I am connected to the internet with eht0 up, the routing
is all incorrect and noting goes out through ppp0 (eh0 must be the
Is there standard "out of the box" Linux tools that will carry out
portmapping on behalf of the LAN PCs ?  (I'm planning on non routable
addresses 192.168.x.x for the LAN, routed outwards via the ppp0
Can someone point me at the right HOWTOs or routing documentation I need

> I wonder if the focus of spambayes ought not to be a classifier that
> leaves the fetching and feeding of messages to auxillary code? That
> way, it could be dropped into whatever harness that suited the
> user's situation.
I see no reason to restrict the project to developing the classifier
and leave the deployment to others.  Attempts at deployment in the
real world will surely provide additional feedback for the classifier.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)