from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B2444103
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:56:04 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:56:04 +0100 (IST)
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7BDlwb02513 for
    <jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:47:58 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25944; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:45:08 +0100
from web13902.mail.yahoo.com (web13902.mail.yahoo.com
    [216.136.175.28]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA25886
    for <ilug@linux.ie>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 14:45:00 +0100
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Aug 12 11:07:06 2002

> First you complain about the supposed lack of
> threading in Internet Mail, and then you reply to
> one of the messages in that thread on an unrelated
> topic, messing things up for those of us with
I follow this list from home, and thus use
a yahoo account. I haven't been able to find
a threading mechanism for this, plus the
my inbox after about a week of no pruning.
This is the reason for my initial grumbling. I
would like to be able to follow what's going
on without clogging up my yahoo account.
Anyway, I should have initiated a new thread for my
different request about S.u.S.E. CDs. I won't repeat
p.s. accidentally emailed privately - sorry!

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A6716F21
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:41:02 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:41:02 +0100 (IST)
from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8QFTPg24659 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 16:29:25 +0100
From rssfeeds@jmason.org  Thu Sep 26 16:41:46 2002