from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF7416F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:06:29 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:06:29 +0100 (IST)
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8N5D4C01928 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:13:08 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE64D3ECD6; Mon, 23 Sep 2002
    01:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F243F77B
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 01:11:10 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8N5BAw20351 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 23 Sep 2002
    01:11:10 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8N5BAh20347 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 01:11:10 -0400
from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8N4rVi23135 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:53:31 -0400
from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com
    [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
    BAA10303 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 01:11:04 -0400
In-reply-to Hal DeVore <haldevore@acm.org> message dated "Fri,
    13 Sep 2002 12:54:56 -0500."
From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Mon Sep 23 12:06:29 2002

>>>Hal DeVore said:
>     "Brent said in his book"
>     This Paste function can be convenient, but it turns out that
>     users still need to keep track of the difference between the
>     two selections.  If a user only understands the CLIPBOARD,
>     then the user of PRIMARY is only surprising.  I learned that
>     it is best to have a separate paste user action for the two
>     selections.  The convention is that <ButtonRelease-2> sets
>     the insert point and inserts the PRIMARY selection. ... The
>     <<Paste>> event (e.g., the Paste key) simply inserts the
>     CLIPBOARD selection at the current insert point. ...
Yeah, I learned by hearing exmh users scream in agony.  Sorry about
all that.  We should be able to clean this up.  If you grep for
"bind" in seditBind you quickly find the Text_Selection proc
I described in the previous email.
--
Brent Welch
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
Pioneering the World's Most Scalable and Agile Storage Network
www.panasas.com
welch@panasas.com
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users