Why should I?  (:
C
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote:
> quitcherbraggin.
>
> :-)
> gg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of CDale
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM
> To: bitbitch@magnesium.net
> Cc: Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
>
>
> I dunno, BB.  Women who like to be thought of this way should have the
> right to choose to be treated this way.  Men too...  ahem.  (:  My boy
> cleans, washes clothes, cooks, fixes stuff, etc, and works the same number
> of hours I do, sometimes more, if he has to catch up with me.  (:  I
> close him because he is industrious and creative, and because he
> unfailingly makes my bed the minute I get out of it.  And boy #2 will be
> here soon to help boy #1 with other things such as pedicures,  backrubs,
> and sure, fucking.  LOL! (along with the aforementioned "chores") Adam can
> have his cake and eat it too, if he can only find the right girl who has
> the same beliefs about gender  roles that he has. Of course, he has NO
> clue where to look, so we will be constantly laughing at him while he
> stumbles around in the dark.
> Cindy
> P.S. the numbers do not in any way indicate importance or favor -- only
> the order in which they move into my house.  -smiles at chris-
> P.S. #2.  I'm moving.   Going to New Orleans.  Can't handle any more cab
> driving.  The summer sucked here on the MS Gulf Coast, instead of rocking
> like it normally does.  Wish me luck.  I'm going to look for another
> computer job.  Le Sigh.  (:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
>
> > Hello Adam,
> >
> > Thursday, September 05, 2002, 11:33:18 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > ALB> So, you're saying that product bundling works? Good point.
> >
> > Sometimes I wish I was still in CA.  You deserve a good beating every
> > so often...  (anyone else want to do the honors?)
> >
> > ALB> And how is this any different from "normal" marriage exactly? Other
> then
> > ALB> that the woman not only gets a man, but one in a country where both
> she and
> > ALB> her offspring will have actual opportunities? Oh and the lack of
> > ALB> "de-feminized, over-sized, self-centered, mercenary-minded" choices?
> >
> > Mmkay.  For the nth time Adam, we don't live in the land of
> > Adam-fantasy.  Women actually are allowed to do things productive,
> > independent and entirely free of their male counterparts.  They aren't
> > forced to cook and clean and merely be sexual vessels.   Sometimes,
> > and this will come as a shock to you, no doubt, men and women even
> > find -love- (which is the crucial distinction between this system) and
> > they marry one another for the satisfaction of being together.   I
> > know, far-fetched and idealistically crazy as it is, but such things
> > do happen.   I can guarantee you, if my mother was approached by my
> > father, and 25 years ago, he commented on her cleaning ability as a
> > motivator for marrying her, we would not be having this conversation
> > now.
> >
> > If guys still have silly antequated ideas about 'women's role' then
> > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce.   Again, these
> > situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the relationship
> > is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a prostitute he
> > doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't impoverished
> > and teeming with AIDS.  A contract, versus a true love-interest
> > marriage.
> >
> > Egh.  I really need to stop analyzing your posts to this extent.   I
> > blame law school and my cat.
> >
> > -BB
> >
> > ALB> - Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
> > ALB>   http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
> > ALB>   beberg@mithral.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn
>
>
>
>
>
--
"I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn