> From:  Anders Eriksson <aeriksson@fastmail.fm>
> Date:  Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:34:43 +0200
>
> Just one more info. I measured the time spent wrapping the stuff in
> Ftoc_Next with time {} so the data is for real. One difference
> between mine and Valdis' setup (judging from his trace) is that I use
> the address book. I've been doing that for ages so that can't be the
> problem.
Assuming it's my fault (which it probably is since nobody else has really been
in there), it's most likely related to the number of sequences in a folder.
I'd guess that something is either being called that shouldn't be or is being
called more times than it should be.
> Is there a way to get the log to print time with higher granularity?
Not that I'm aware of.  If you look in the code, there are various places
where the time function is called in order to see how long it took to do
things.  You'll probably want to borrow that technique.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues                 http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO                          http://www.virCIO.Com
716 Congress, Suite 200
Austin, TX  78701		+1 512 374 0500
World War III:  The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5B94415A
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 05:45:38 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:45:38 +0100 (IST)
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7S1APZ05113 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 02:10:25 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9FF3FEC4; Tue, 27 Aug 2002
    21:10:29 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3213F6EC
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:08:32 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g7S18TP24258 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 27 Aug 2002
    21:08:29 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7S18TY24254 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:08:29 -0400
from blackcomb.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by
    mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g7S0rSl17185 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:53:28 -0400
from medlicott.panasas.com (IDENT:welch@medlicott.panasas.com
    [172.17.132.188]) by blackcomb.panasas.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
    VAA30178; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:08:13 -0400
In-reply-to Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU> message dated "Tue,
    27 Aug 2002 15:58:58 +0700."
From exmh-workers-admin@redhat.com  Wed Aug 28 10:46:06 2002