from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MM5UZ26911 for <zzzz@spamassassin.taint.org>;
    Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:05:31 +0100

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F516F67
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 10:51:36 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:51:36 +0100 (IST)
from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9980JK25152 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:00:19 +0100
No, hits=-1023.6 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50
	version=2.50-cvs
From rssfeeds@jmason.org  Wed Oct  9 10:52:38 2002

On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
> Hmmm again.... You're telling me that you've never had a nasty bug that took
> you a couple of days to track down that had to do with a memory leak?  I am
> not the best C/C++ programmer... not even close... But I've known really
> good ones... and even they have nasty bugs that have to do with memory
> management, however occasional they may be.
OK, noone has been tool-less for memory management for a LONG time. Most
systems you just add a flag and memory is tracked (that's how i've always
done it) or worst case yuo have to run it through one of the 2.3E7 tools
where you simply recompile and it it tells you where the leaks are.
Memory management is a non-issue for anyone that has any idea at all how the
hardware functions. Granted, this takes 30 minutes to go over, and so is far
beyond the scope of the "Learn Java in 90 minutes without thinking" book
every Java programmer learned from.
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
beberg@mithral.com

from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BJrYC29444 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 20:53:34 +0100
from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E4C3F8E1; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:53:46 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CD3F1F9
    for <exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:49:29 -0400
    (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8BJnOp25735 for exmh-workers@listman.redhat.com; Wed, 11 Sep 2002
    15:49:24 -0400
from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8BJnOk25731 for
    <exmh-workers@redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:49:24 -0400