Revoking self-submitted content (unblocking something you accidentally
blocked) results in permanent deletion of said content from the
network.
Fortunately, Razor2/SpamNet isa network of content people DON'T want
[in their inbox, let alone IP rights].  Block away!
--jordan
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:24:33PM -0700, Craig R.Hughes wrote:
# "Free" is a relative concept if you actually read the EULA.  No
# commercial use, and anything you submit to razor becomes entirely
# their intellectual property.  Better not accidentally hit "This is
# spam" on anything you want to retain IP rights to.

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4596C16F1F
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 11:26:08 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 05 Sep 2002 11:26:08 +0100 (IST)
from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g84IoYZ15135 for <jm-razor@jmason.org>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 19:50:34 +0100
from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17meze-0003Rp-00; Wed,
    04 Sep 2002 11:35:10 -0700
from gwp-32.gwp.com ([206.117.30.231]
    helo=gwpmail01.corp.vipmail.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17mezN-0003yS-00 for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 11:34:53 -0700
from Ariel (unverified [198.6.50.33]) by
    gwpmail01.corp.vipmail.com (Vircom SMTPRS 5.3.228) with ESMTP id
    <B0001379876@gwpmail01.corp.vipmail.com> for
    <razor-users@lists.sourceforge.net>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:35:53 -0700
[Razor-users] Windows port / bug reports?
From razor-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Sep  5 11:26:08 2002

Newbie (to the list) question;  I've been working on porting the code to
run under Perl on Windows.  The changes are fairly minor and can be made
to interoperate with the current code.  How would one best go about
getting those changes merged in (better question, would there be
interest in such a version and getting those changes merged in)?