from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EE616F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:32:33 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 10 Oct 2002 12:32:33 +0100 (IST)
from dogma.slashnull.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9A84QK14194 for
    <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:04:26 +0100
No, hits=-959.4 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,T_NONSENSE_FROM_00_10,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_10_20,T_NONSENSE_FROM_20_30,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_30_40,T_NONSENSE_FROM_40_50,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_50_60,T_NONSENSE_FROM_60_70,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,T_NONSENSE_FROM_80_90,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_90_91,T_NONSENSE_FROM_91_92,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_92_93,T_NONSENSE_FROM_93_94,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_94_95,T_NONSENSE_FROM_95_96,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_96_97,T_NONSENSE_FROM_97_98,
	      T_NONSENSE_FROM_98_99,T_NONSENSE_FROM_99_100
	version=2.50-cvs

Military communications could be jammed or intercepted and satellites thrown
off course or destroyed, a new US study warns

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5144119
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 05:59:14 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:59:14 +0100 (IST)
from sonic.spamtraps.taint.org (spamassassin.sonic.net
    [64.142.3.172]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7FMvZ721900 for <jm@jmason.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:57:35 +0100
by sonic.spamtraps.taint.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id
    0FDC2138EFF; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
From nobody@sonic.spamtraps.taint.org  Fri Aug 16 11:08:45 2002

Problem with spamtrap
Could not lock /home/yyyy/lib/spamtrap/spam.mbox: File exists at lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/NoMailAudit.pm line 484, <STDIN> line 207.

In a message dated 9/24/2002 11:24:58 AM, jamesr@best.com writes:
>This situation wouldn't have happened in the first place if California
>didn't have economically insane regulations.  They created a regulatory
>climate that facilitated this.  So yes, it is the product of
>over-regulation.
>
Which is to say, if you reduce the argument to absurdity, that law causes
crime.
(Yes, I agree that badly written law can make life so frustrating that people
have little choice but to subvery it if they want to get anything done. This
is also true of corporate policies, and all other attempts to regulate
conduct by rules. Rules just don't work well when situations are fluid or
ambiguous. But I don't think that the misbehavior of energy companies in
California can properly be called well-intentioned lawbreaking by parties who
were trying to do the right thing but could do so only by falling afoul of
some technicality.)
If you want to get to root causes, we should probably go to the slaying of
Abel by Cain. Perhaps we can figure out what went wrong then, and roll our
learning forward through history and create a FoRKtopia.
Nonpartisanly, which is to say casting stones on all houses, whether
bicameral or unicameral, built on sand or on rock, to the left of them or to
the right of them, of glass or brick or twig or straw,
Tom