from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADF744173
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 06:06:36 -0400 (EDT)
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7MM4mZ26717 for
    <zzzz-ilug@example.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:04:48 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25152; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:02:40 +0100
from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com
    [216.136.174.115]) by lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA25126
    for <ilug@linux.ie>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:02:32 +0100
from p977.as2.cra.dublin.eircom.net (HELO mfrenchw2k)
    (mfrench42@159.134.179.209 with login) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with
    SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 22:02:25 -0000

>  >erm... it runs Solaris x86 as standard...
And will run Solaris 9 when Sun catch up with the x86 drivers and kernel.
Although don't hold your breath for the free DVD. It will never come.
(Spot the person who applied for the free Solaris 9 DVD, only to be told
three months later it is no longer available.<mutter>)
FWIW Solaris and Linux seem to be getting closer all the time. I can no
longer see any specific reason why one is better than the other. Expect Red

> [Guido]
> > Perhaps more useful would be if Tim could check in the pickle(s?)
> > generated by one of his training runs, so that others can see how
> > Tim's training data performs against their own corpora.
[Tim]
> I did that yesterday, but seems like nobody bit.
I downloaded and played with it a bit, but had no time to do anything
systematic.  It correctly recognized a spam that slipped through SA.
But it also identified as spam everything in my inbox that had any
MIME structure or HTML parts, and several messages in my saved 'zope
geeks' list that happened to be using MIME and/or HTML.
So I guess I'll have to retrain it (yes, you told me so :-).
> Just in case <wink>, I
> uploaded a new version just now.  Since MINCOUNT went away, UNKNOWN_SPAMPROB
> is much less likely, and there's almost nothing that can be pruned away (so
> the file is about 5x larger now).
>
>     http://sf.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=61702
I'll try this when I have time.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)