from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01EA441EC
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  6 Aug 2002 06:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 06 Aug 2002 11:48:26 +0100 (IST)
from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g74IR1v04830 for
    <jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:27:01 +0100
from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA32249; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:24:44 +0100
from tcob1.net (d-airlock229.esatclear.ie [194.145.133.229]) by
    lugh.tuatha.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA32220 for <ilug@linux.ie>;
    Sun, 4 Aug 2002 19:24:37 +0100
lugh.tuatha.org: Host d-airlock229.esatclear.ie
    [194.145.133.229] claimed to be tcob1.net
from tcob1.net ([192.168.0.1]) by tcob1.net with esmtp (Exim
    4.10) id 17bQ3P-0007Vz-00 for ilug@linux.ie; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 19:24:35
    +0100
from sean by tcob1.net with local (Exim 4.02) id
    17bQ3G-0004wF-00 for ilug@linux.ie; Sun, 04 Aug 2002 19:24:26 +0100
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i586-pc-linux-gnu)
exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/)
    *17bQ3P-0007Vz-00*wPfgMoISSJ6*
From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Tue Aug  6 11:53:53 2002

On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Albert White stated:
> I decided to upgrade the kernel on a machine at home from 2.2.18pre21
> to the latest from kernel.org which is 2.4.19.
> However I have encountered one problem, my network card now dosent
> Aug  4 11:31:51 mira kernel: eth0: 3c5x9 at 0x220, 10baseT port,
> Aug  4 11:31:51 mira kernel: address 00 10 5a 3e 0e 48, IRQ 5.
> Aug  4 11:31:51 mira kernel: eth1: 3c5x9 at 0x300, 10baseT port,
> Aug  4 11:31:51 mira kernel: address 00 10 5a be 0e 48, IRQ 10.
> This results in the interface(s) coming up but while packets can go
> I've tried not loading the 3c509 mdule on bootup and then `modload
> 3c509 IRQ=10` bit it still gets loaded as above, on IRQ 5 and 10. On
I have been unable to get the 3c509 to work with 2.4.19 with an IRQ of
10 which works in 2.2.x okay. Can you use anyother irq for it.
Linux User:      231986          Jabber:   tcobone@jabber.org
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.