from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D702416F16
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 17:01:46 +0100 (IST)
from n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com (n18.grp.scd.yahoo.com
    [66.218.66.73]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g98EjEK20113 for <zzzz@spamassassin.taint.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:45:15 +0100
From sentto-2242572-56027-1034088329-zzzz=spamassassin.taint.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com  Tue Oct  8 17:02:17 2002

[Tim]
>> Why would spam be likely to end up with two instances of Return-Path
>> in the headers?
[Greg Ward]
> Possibly another qmail-ism from Bruce Guenter's spam collection.
Doesn't seem *likely*, as it appeared in about 900 of about 14,000 spams.
It could be specific to one of his bait addresses, though -- don't know.  A
nice thing about a statistical inferencer is that you really don't have to
know why a thing works, just whether it works <wink>.
> Or maybe Anthony's right about spammers being stupid and blindly copying
> headers. (Well, of course he's right about spammers being stupid; it's
> just this particular aspect of stupidity that's open to question.)
I'm going to blow it off -- it's just another instance of being pointlessly
baffled by a mixed corpus half of which I don't know enough about.

No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      REFERENCES,T_QUOTE_TWICE_1
	version=2.50-cvs

On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:44:15 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@urgent.rug.ac.be> wrote:
> > Matthias Saou (matthias@egwn.net) wrote*:
> > >As Red Hat does, I really don't recommend trying to upgrade between betas
> > >or from a beta to a final release either. Simply backup your /home, /etc
> > >(and /root and/or /usr/local/ if needed) then reinstall cleanly, it'll
> > >probably save a few hassles and you'll get the cleanest possible system ;-)
Yeah, I need to work this out, too; I just learned my lesson about living on the bleeding edge. Lesson learned?  NO MORE XIMIAN, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.  Man, that was annoying.
Anyway, I have returned to Redhat 7.3 on my root filesystem (saved my home directories, music and games on other partitions) and while I have the 8.0 stuff in the list, everything I want to upgrade requires 200+ RPMs.
I'm not opposed to this, but apt is.  "apt-get dist-upgrade" dumps core.
What's the inside secret here, or do I just start searching mirrors for the ISO and get over it?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrländer              Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN                    My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ  5119262
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just machines, to make big decisions- programmed by fellas with
compassion and vision.  We'll be clean when that work is done;
Eternally free and eternally young.  Linux.
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list