from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0254415B
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 11:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:21:59 +0100 (IST)
No, hits=-10.0 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.40-cvs

Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
> problems.... Why do most computer scientists insist on solving the same
> problems over and over again when there are some many more important and
> interesting problems (high level) to be solved ?????
Amen!
Doing it in an (unecessarily) harder way does NOT make you more of a man
(or less of a kiddie).
- Joe

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450743F9B
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 11:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 16:21:54 +0100 (IST)
No, hits=-10.8 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.40-cvs

On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Reza B'Far (eBuilt) wrote:
> 2.  C and C++ forces the developer to solve problems such as memory
> management over and over again.  IMHO, Java is superior because the problem
> of programming in the future is not about 0's and 1's, making the compiler
> 2% faster, or making your code take 5% less memory... It's about design
> patterns, architecture, high level stuff...
Considering 90% of the fake job posting I see are for embedded systems or
device drivers - C still rules the world.
> 3.  Java is not just a programming language! It's also a platform... There
> is NOTHING like the standard API's in Java in C and C++.  Everyone defines
> their own API's, people end up solving the same problems ten different ways
The problem is the problem you're trying to solve is never the same. Java
will soon suffer API-rot (alot of poeple are already complaining about it),
it's just new. C was clean in the beginning too. API-rot is PURELY a
function of age.
> 4.  If you have a program of any type of high complexity written in C, you
> can't possibly think that you could port it to different platforms within
> the same magnitude of cost as Java....
I do this all the time, It's alot easier then you think if the original
programmer had a clue at all... Java does remove the clue requirement tho,
just adds a huge testing requirement, QA guys aren't as cheap ;)
> 5.  Makes no sense for a scientific or a business project to depend on a
> person... Java, IMHO, reduces the dependence of these entities on the
> individual developer as it is much easier to reverse engineer Java as it is
> to reverse engineer C (large applications).
No it's not, but you can hire teams of Javites for cheap at your local high
school. Java is about cutting costs and commoditizing programming - and it's
working!
- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
beberg@mithral.com