Craig,
I don't really understand how you can make the claims that you
make without a full understanding of TeS, which you can't have
because we haven't published the details.
In the end, given that you don't know much about TeS or how it
works, your statements really call into question your intentions
given that you have a competing product in this space.
Regards,
--jordan

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B66916F16
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue,  8 Oct 2002 10:55:17 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 08 Oct 2002 10:55:17 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g987avK05522 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:36:57 +0100
No, hits=-9.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,T_NONSENSE_FROM_70_80,
	      USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.50-cvs

Dave Long writes:
> > (and no it wasnt me even though the spellingis
> > oddly familar)
>
> Not that this is news to FoRKs, but:
>
> <http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/archives/000393.html>
>
> > ... randomising letters in the middle of words [has] little or no
> > effect on the ability of skilled readers to understand the text. This
> > is easy to denmtrasote. In a pubiltacion of New Scnieitst you could
> > ramdinose all the letetrs, keipeng the first two and last two the same,
> > and reibadailty would hadrly be aftcfeed. My ansaylis did not come
> > to much beucase the thoery at the time was for shape and senqeuce
> > retigcionon.  Saberi's work sugsegts we may have some pofrweul palrlael
> > prsooscers at work. The resaon for this is suerly that idnetiyfing
> > coentnt by paarllel prseocsing speeds up regnicoiton. We only need
> > the first and last two letetrs to spot chganes in meniang.
Hmm, there's probably a patentable input-method for
touch-tone keypads in there somewhere.
- Gordon

No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES
	version=2.50-cvs