No, hits=-10.4 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	      QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT_PINE,
	      WEIRD_PORT,X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.50-cvs

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Chris Haun wrote:
> ok i read back, thats not a typo, you mean three thousand lovers.
> where do you get your data? It seems very unlikely, but if you have
> supporting evidence i'd like to see it.
I haven't seen any official data on the web (the high-ranking hits are
overrun by religious bigots), but there's some anecdotal evidence to be
found in
http://sunsite.berkeley.edu:2020/dynaweb/teiproj/oh/science/aidsnur2/@Generic__BookTextView/5406
(search for promiscuity). They mention 300 to 500 partners a year.
(Anecdotally. This is not a statistic). They also mention that this was
specific to gay males. Lesbians don't dig promiscuity in that degree.

No, hits=-0.5 required=7.0
	tests=KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,PGP_MESSAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41-cvs

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD2D16F21
	for <zzzz@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 10:51:29 +0100 (IST)
from egwn.net (auth02.nl.egwn.net [193.172.5.4]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g996ujK23217 for
    <zzzz-rpm@spamassassin.taint.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:56:45 +0100

I wrote:
> [The bytecode interpreter] may improve non-antialiased rendering, but
> only at the expense of making a mess of antialiased rendering.
Then again, perhaps the particular font I'm using just has bad
bytecodes.  That font is "QuickType II", grabbed off my Windows
partition, where it was installed by I-have-no-idea-which-application.
Anybody else experimenting with bytecode-enabled freetype, presumably
with different fonts?  Do you find the same bad antialiased rendering
that I found, or do other fonts work well?
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A87D43C56
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 05:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:46:24 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7LLhPZ10876 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:43:25 +0100
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 37F522940CA; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
from smtp2.nwfusion.com (smtp2.nwfusion.com [65.214.57.185]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FF62940AC for <fork@xent.com>;
    Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
from sandy (sandy [65.214.57.186]) by smtp2.nwfusion.com
    (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g7LLfBS20204 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Article to check on Network World Fusion