On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:27:12 PDT, J C Lawrence writes:
>I run exmh on my desktops at home and at work with the resulting
>exmh windows being displayed on both my work and home desktops (gratis
>SSH X11 forwarding).  In fact, your message was read and replied to
>(this message) while at work, using an exmh instance running on my home
>machine.
So you have 4 copies (1+1 per desktop) of exmh running?
That's what I usually do, but what I'd really like would be some
automagism to tell them "Flist", "Rescan Folder", which I now do
manually whenever I'm going to work at the "other" machine.
cheers,
&rw
--
-- In the first place, God made idiots;
-- though this was for practice only;
-- then he made users. (Mark Twain, modified)

from listman.example.com (listman.example.com [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8ANseC22497 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:54:41 +0100
from listman.example.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F893EA8B; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    19:55:02 -0400 (EDT)
from int-mx1.corp.example.com (int-mx1.corp.example.com
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D8613EA78
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:54:45 -0400 (EDT)
(from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.example.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g8ANsem12415 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002
    19:54:40 -0400
from mx1.example.com (mx1.example.com [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8ANsek12411 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:54:40 -0400
No, hits=-9.0 required=7.0
	tests=AWL,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,REFERENCES,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_LOOP
	version=2.50-cvs

Thanks Brent: now it's clearer (to me) what's needed. I've used the global
sort and J C Lawrence's re-scan, but there is still a vulnerability there:
If I have an instance of exmh running, the folder I'm visiting will have
its new, correct .xmhcache overwritten with an incorrect one when I switch
folders. I can cron the sort and re-scan process, but I should kill running
exmh's first.
Best would be to have a button for "Global sort and update all scan caches"
in the exmh More... menu
--
rick
>>>>> "Brent" == Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>
>>>>> wrote the following on Tue, 10 Sep 2002 14:31:48 -0700
Brent> There is an "Update all scan caches" menu entry that rescans your
Brent> folders similar to the short scripts folks have shared around.  It
Brent> runs in the background.
_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users