from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5C316F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:29:47 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:29:47 +0100 (IST)
from mail.evergo.net ([206.191.151.2]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g8HKUvC25665 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:30:58 +0100
<yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org>, "'Gary Lawrence Murphy'" <garym@canada.com>
From johnhall@evergo.net  Tue Sep 17 23:29:48 2002

> From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org [mailto:yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:50 AM
> > ... we've been fighting the War on Terrorism for as long
> > as there's been commerce, so you'd think we'd /realize/ that
> > escalation of violence is not a solution.
>
> Well said!
>
> --j.
Yeah.  It certainly wasn't a solution to the Carthaginian problem or the
Barbary Pirates.  Wait ... no ... actually ... it was a rather permanent
solution.

from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7517616F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:29:50 +0100 (IST)
from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:29:50 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HKbbC25882 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:37:38 +0100
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 3B2DE2940C8; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
from hotmail.com (dav26.law15.hotmail.com [64.4.22.83]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D652940C8 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
    Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:36:22 -0700
From fork-admin@xent.com  Tue Sep 17 23:29:50 2002

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Villa" <louie@ximian.com>
>
> They were the ruling class of a feudal, farming society for quite some
> time; I believe there were more than a few issues there. Certainly, not
> everyone in Tibet is as excited about the Dalai Lama as Hollywood
> appears to be. [Not that the Chinese are much better rights-wise, but
> they've actually built roads and such, which led to the creation of
> merchant classes and the like that never existed under the Tibetans.]
And it's not /going/ to exist under the Tibetans, because it'll be owned and
operated by Chinese nationals.