It's official, the holidays are here.  I got HTML mail from one of the
little catalogs I've been known to purchase from....basically the front
Must have been released simultaneously with mailing for a delivery target

No, hits=-4.4 required=7.0
	tests=FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,NOSPAM_INC,
	      RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,TO_LOCALPART_EQ_REAL,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.40-cvs

Gary's news service at teledyn.com has an article on Internet Saturation.
Let me ask you....If you were on a rock in the middle of the Atlantic,
mostly in the dark for half the year, wouldn't *you* like a bit of
internet distraction?   They've already done the obvious and fiber-ringed
the island.
Eirikur
--------
Latest guestimate stats from Ireland's NUA show a flattening Internet
population growth. It seems there's two kinds of people, those who will go
online with the status quo, and those who won't: Canada levels out at 53%,
the USA at 59% (since 2000!), Denmark flatlines at 60%, Norway at 54%,
Sweden at 64%, and the UK at 55% ... only Iceland continues unfettered
beyond 60%. Could this be evidence of a usability barrier? If so, it's a
clear signal that there's as much fortune to be gained from a
substantially new Internet interface than all that has been gained so far.
Latest guestimate stats from Ireland's NUA show a flattening Internet
population growth. It seems there's two kinds of people, those who will go
online with the status quo, and those who won't: Canada levels out at 53%,
the USA at 59% (since 2000!), Denmark flatlines at 60%, Norway at 54%,
Sweden at 64%, and the UK at 55% ... only Iceland continues unfettered
beyond 60%. Could this be evidence of a usability barrier? If so, it's a
clear signal that there's as much fortune to be gained from a
substantially new Internet interface than all that has been gained so far.
http://www.nua.ie/surveys/how_many_online/

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074EC43F99
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:27:33 +0100 (IST)
from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7TASnZ08263 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:28:49 +0100
from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 7A1BF2940C4; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
from mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (unknown [212.2.188.179]) by
    xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B5C294099 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
from phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com
    [192.168.2.14]) by mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
    id g7TARC502451; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:27:12 +0100
by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id
    93A1F43F99; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 06:24:44 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5933D8D;
    Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:24:44 +0100 (IST)
Message from Gary Lawrence Murphy <garym@canada.com> of
    "28 Aug 2002 15:06:39 EDT."
    <m2vg5u3irk.fsf@maya.dyndns.org>
No, hits=-28.3 required=7.0
	tests=HABEAS_SWE,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.40-cvs
From fork-admin@xent.com  Thu Aug 29 11:27:33 2002