I am a php programmer (very busy one at that - anglemail.org) but if someone
gets to this before me, I would also love to se the code because I want my
>Sorry, this hasn't got much to do with rpm packages directly ;-)
>My "builds" page is getting bigger and bigger, and quite messy as
>directories are listed in no particular order :
>What I'd need is to have last modification date of the directory displayed
>next to the directory name (sort of like "mplayer - Thu Aug 1 2002"), and
>the list ordered to have the most recent entries at the top.
>Now, if there are php programmers on this list, I'd love to have their help
>on how to do this ;-) It must be quite simple to get the system mtime for
>the directory, it's the ordering that scares me a bit more.
>Attached is the current code (please keep in mind that I'm not a
>programmer, it usually explains a lot ;-)).

from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A5B43FB1
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 10:11:43 -0400 (EDT)
from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 09 Aug 2002 15:11:43 +0100 (IST)
from webnote.net (mail.webnote.net [193.120.211.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g79E6lb04743 for
    <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 15:06:47 +0100
from egwn.net ([193.172.5.4]) by webnote.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with
    ESMTP id NAA06043 for <jm-rpm@jmason.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 13:16:56 +0100
From rpm-list-admin@freshrpms.net  Fri Aug  9 15:11:44 2002

On Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:34:23 +0200, Matthias Saou <matthias@egwn.net> wrote:
> Well, I stand corrected :-)
> The thing is, I hadn't used gconf-editor yet... and it's exactly what I
> feared, old "not so good" memories are coming back : It looks exactly like
> a GNOME RegEdit :-/ Oh well.
> I still hope that the few missing features I'm still looking for will be
> added in the next 2.0.x releases, like for example being able to have the
> panel always under *all* other windows (if you know how to do that, I'm
> really interested! ;-)).
>
Ya know, I was thinking the same thing.  But there's at least two main 'opposing thumbs' between regedit and gconf:
1. GConf is written in English, not symbol tables; you can actually READ what the heck you're looking at.
2. Because it's better-considered, it should be more sound; when the registry gets a wrong value, you may not be able to boot....if GConf is scrogged, you can still have all the underlying power of the OS to keep things running....just call up WindowMaker (or whatever) for the next session until you get it worked out.
It took me a while to warm up to it...but I *do* like Gconf...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrländer              Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN                    My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ  5119262
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Waddling" into the mainstream?  I suppose...
http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20020805/4333165s.htm
_______________________________________________
RPM-List mailing list <RPM-List@freshrpms.net>
http://lists.freshrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/rpm-list