Referee opinions versus subsequent citations: a little subjective data

I recently found a paper file of referee reports, reviews etc written by myself in 1992-5. Below is data relating "enthusiasm of my report", on a scale of 1 (poor) to 2 (average published paper) to 3 (excellent), and this is compared to number of Google Scholar citations of the paper (checked in 2007).

enthusiasm citations

1 * 0 0 1 4

1+ * 0 0 1 1 2 3

2- * 1 1 1 1 3 3 5 5 7 8 8 12

2 * 1 3 4 6 8 23

2+ * 4 4 13 14

3- * 27 37

3 * 38 42 85 450

enthusiasm		citations
	1	*	0	0	1	4
	1+	*	0	0	1	1	2	3
	2-	*	1	1	1	1	3	3	5	5	7	8	8	12
	2	*	1	3	4	6	8	23
	2+	*	4	4	13	14
	3-	*	27	37
	3	*	38	42	85	450