Freshman Seminar: Probability in Science, Sports and Life
(Fall 2003)
Instructor: David Aldous
This is a "debriefing" version edited after the course finished.
Courses in mathematical probability teach you to do certain mathematical
calculations, but
are often far removed from broader questions about the the role of randomness
in the ``real world" of science or of human affairs.
This Freshman Seminar course is intended as an introduction
to such questions using minimal mathematics.
I will talk about topics such as
- Where does randomness come from? -- the fine-grain principle.
- Coincidence and Noise: the background randomness of Life
- What math says about the Stock Market
- Game theory: from rock-paper-scissors to the Battle of the Sexes
- Chance in sports: why this year's top teams will probably
do less well next year
- The psychology of risk
- Card shuffling and computer sorting algorithms
- The tipping point: when small changes can make a big difference
- Chance models and the phylogeny of species
- Coding: for secrecy or for efficient communication.
Text
There is no text, but I suggest students look at one or both
of the two following books.
- Bernstein, Peter L.
Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk.
Wiley, 1996.
- Haigh, John,
Taking Chances
Oxford University Press, 1999.
The first is primarily historical and verbal.
The second gives simple mathematical study of various
real-world questions about games of chance and sports.
I will talk about Chapter 16 of Bernstein
and Chapter 6 of Haigh.
Student responsibilities
The student's responsibility is to carry out a small project,
write it up and present it in class (15 minutes).
In choosing a project you are encouraged to pursue your own
interests.
Here are some suggestions for types of project,
from least to most imaginative.
1. A topic report.
Choose a topic from one the the books above,
or below, or a book of your own choice. Best to seek
one
interesting idea to discuss; don't try to summarize a whole book.
2.
A project involving data-collection or experiment to confirm
or refute some general idea in probability.
We'll see examples in the first two classes.
Suggestions below.
Books (sources for topic reports)
Popular Science
- Peterson, Ivars.
The Jungles of Randomness.
Wiley, 1998.
- Bennett, Deborah J.
Randomness .
Harvard University Press, 1999.
- Everitt, Brian S.
Chance Rules .
Copernicus, 1999.
Sports, Games of Chance
- Albert, Jim and Bennett, Jay.
Curve Ball: Baseball, Statistics and the Role of Chance in
the Game
Copernicus Books, 2001.
- Packel, Edward W.
The Mathematics of Games and Gambling
Mathematical Assoc. America, 1981.
Evolution
- Dawkins, Richard.
Climbing Mount Improbable.
Norton, 1997.
Stock Market
- Taleb, Nassim Nicholas
Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in the Markets and in Life
. Texere, 2001.
- Shiller, Robert J.
Irrational Exuberance.
Broadway 2001.
- Malkiel, Burton Gordon
A Random Walk Down Wall Street.
Norton, 1999.
Everyday Life
- Ropeik, David and Gray, George.
Risk (a practical guide for deciding what's really safe and
what's really dangerous in the world around you)
Houghton Mifflin 2002.
More books on different real-world topics
- Gladwell, Malcolm.
The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference.
Little, Brown 2000.
- Ward, Peter Douglas and Brownlee, Donald.
Rare Earth: why complex life is uncommon in the universe.
Copernicus 2000.
More mathematical books
- Morris, S. Brent.
Magic Tricks, Card Shuffling and Dynamic Computer memories.
Mathematical Association of America 1998.
..... and my particular favorite
- Shiller, Robert J.
The New Financial Order. Princeton University Press 2003.
Some possible projects
Talk with me before starting any project.
Little real-world experiments
- Biased pennies. If you spin a penny fast on a flat
surface, it eventually stops "heads" or "tails", but (surprise!)
it's more often tails than heads; and the chance (p, say) of tails varies
from one penny to another. What are the largest and smallest values of p
you can find?
- Dropping thumbtacks.
OK, this is pretty boring, but a natural example. Drop 100
thumbtacks on a surface, and count how many are "point up".
Repeat. Theory says the two counts (maybe 68 and 62) are likely to be
within 10 of each other. Does this prediction work?
Looking for data (library or Internet)
- Risky plays in sport. Theory says: if you're winning
then play conservatively (that is, non-risky), but if you're
losing then you need to take risks. Look for data to show
if this really happens. For instance, in football one can use
interceptions as an indicator of risky play. Theory says that
a more-than-usual number of interceptions will be thrown in the
last quarter by the team that's behind. Football fans say
"of course this happens", but can you get actual data?
What about soccer? Suppose than, 5 minutes before the end,
one team is ahead by 1 goal. Theory says (can you think why?)
that during the final 5 minutes, the "ahead" team is more likely to
score than the "behind" team. Can you find data?
- Separating skill and luck in sports.
If all teams in a league were equally good, then we can think
of the winner of each game as being random; at season end
the teams would have different winning percentages, just by chance,
and theory predicts the s.d. (size of spread) of these
winning percentages. In fact, some teams are better than others,
and the actual s.d. is larger. So by comparing actual and
theoretical s.d. one can measure
relative effects of skill and luck. Within this topic there
are many possible projects
- Comparing different sports -- does luck play a larger role
in football or baseball?
- Sometimes a team may seem to have a slump or a surge in the
final month, say. Does this in fact happen more often than
"just by chance" would predict?
- Hot streaks. Individual athletes often believe in "hot streaks"
where they are unusually successful (basketball shots, golf, baseball
pitcher's no-hit innings, etc). Do these actually happen more often than
"just by chance" would predict?
- The regression effect predicts that, if you look at (say)
baseball teams with an overall winning record one season, then
the majority of them will have worse records next season
than this season. Does this actually happen?
- Zipf's law.
This concerns data-sets which show relative frequencies of different
alternatives. For instance, if you ask a sample of people for
their favorite flavor of ice cream, you might get data like
(chocolate 42%; vanilla 26%; strawberry 15%; etc).
Or if you look at the Statistics Dept web site data on
files downloaded each month, you see (December 2000) that the
most-often-downloaded files have frequencies
(1.91%, 1.58%, 1.57%, 1.46%, 1.45%,.....).
Or take a long book and find the frequencies of different words
("the" 3.1%, "a" 1.7%, .....).
Zipf's law predicts that if f_i is the i'th largest frequency then
(at least for i in the middle of the list) there should be
a power law approximation
f_i = c i^{-a}
for some c and a.
Find some actual data and see if this is really true.
- Risks in everyday life
It's often said that people are usually inaccurate in assessing
relative risks of unlikely events -- being killed in a auto
accident, in a plane crash, being struck by lightning, winning
the lottery, etc. Find data on actual chances, and give the class
a quiz to see how well they can guess which are more or less likely.
More complex projects (for groups of students)
- Media scares caused by coincidences.
One of the general themes of probability is "coincidences
happen more often than you would imagine".
In particular, statisticians believe that when some kind of
dramatic event (plane crash, train crash, school shooting, fatal fire, kidnapping)
happens twice within a short time, it attracts excessive media
attention, even if there has been no change in the actual
frequency of such events.
So the project is: look through (say) Time magazine for the year 2000
to find articles like this; then find actual data about frequencies
of these events for (say) the last ten years, to see whether
anything unusual really was happening in 2000.
- Insurance deductibles.
By increasing the "deductible" (the amount of a loss that you must
pay yourself) on auto or fire or theft insurance, you can reduce
the cost of your insurance policy. Theory suggests that on average
this is a "gamble" which is in your favor
(because the insurance company must change enough to cover its
payouts, plus expenses and profit). Can you find data?